Eugenia florida De Candolle 1828
Bibliographic record
Abstract
6. Eugenia florida De Candolle (1828: 283). Type:— BRAZIL. Amazonas: in Brasilia ad ripam flum. Amazonum, s.d., Martius s.n. (holotype M). Eugenia oligoneura O. Berg (1857: 321). Type:— PERU. Maynas: Muniches, March, Poeppig 2353 (syntype B†; lectotype W!, designated here; isolectotypes F!, G!). Eugenia coloradoensis Standley (1937: 27). Type:— PANAMA. Barro Colorado Island, shores of Gatún Lake S of the laboratory, 28 Aug 1929, W. N. Bangham 445 (holotype F!). [Nom. nov. of Eugenia melanosticta Standley (1930: 126), non Eugenia melanosticta (Miquel, 1855: 432) Koorders & Valenton (1900: 159)] Syn. nov. Note:—Barrie (2009), in Flora Mesoamericana, referred Eugenia coloradoensis as different of E. florida, using characters that we believe are circunscribed under the variation of E. florida (e.g. dimensions of the pedicels, fruits and number of stamens, Mazine in prep.). Therefore, Eugenia coloradoensis should be recognized as a synonym of E. florida. Distribution:—One of the most common species of the section, Eugenia florida is broadly distributed in Neotropical region. Plates of Eugenia florida can be observed in Bünger et al. (2012), Holst et al. (2003), Lorenzi et al. (2006), Lorenzi (1998), Moraes & Lombardi (2006), Pott & Pott (1994) and Romagnolo & Souza (2006).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".