Chaetonotus (Primochaetus) heideri Brehm 1917
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chaetonotus (Primochaetus) heideri Brehm, 1917 (Figure 1 A-F, 2A-G, 3A-B) Diagnosis of the Indian population of Chaetonotus (Primochaetus) heideri Brehm, 1917: The individuals from India exhibit a bottle-to-ten-pin shape with a three-lobed head. On average, the dimensions of the Indian specimens are as follows: body length = 170 μm, body maximum width = 50 μm, head width = 40 μm, mouth diameter = 10 μm, pharynx length = 45 μm, pharynx width = 15 μm, adhesive tube length = 20 μm, posterior-dorsal scale length = 11 μm, egg length = 28 μm, Egg width = 11 μm. The body is flexible, and the cuticle is covered in scales and spines, which extend over the entire animal. The scales exhibit an anterior double edge, characteristic of the taxon, with dorsal spines increasing in length from the anterior to the posterior end. The spines become barbed approximately at the near-middle portion of each spine. The posterior end is furcated, and each furcal branch terminates with a thin adhesive tube. Posteriormost spines are parallel to the adhesive tubes and do not exceed the length of the tubes. Occurrence: India- (present study); Elsewhere: The species is thus far reported from U.S.A. (Emberton, 1980), Italy (Balsamo & Fregni, 1995), Sweden (Kånneby et al., 2009, 2013), Brazil (Garraffoni et al., 2010; Kånneby et al., 2013), Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Romania, Russia (Schwank, 1990; Kånneby, 2013), Poland (Kolicka et al., 2013, 2020), Ukraine (Trokhymchuk, 2020). Remarks: New record to Indian waters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".