MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6911785384 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.1403226

SuperDARN Radar Software Toolkit (RST) 4.2

2018· other· en· W6911785384 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2018
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoftwareDocumentationAliasDebuggingRadarBoundary (topology)Data fileReading (process)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New features in version 4.2 of the Radar Software Toolkit (RST) include: TS18 and TS18-Kp statistical convection model (TS18 replacing CS10 as default) Statistical convection model solver (solve_model) Added pre-1900 coefficients for use with AACGM_v2 Implemented new --version option to print current RST version number Added unrecognized command line option handling to remaining binaries Disabled low-power thresholding when converting between dat and rawacf format files Fixed bug when reading data from early (~1993-1995) dat format files Fixed bug when reading records with negative scan flag values Fixed bugs in gridtogrdmap and maptocnvmap conversion routines Fixed bug in trim_fit to allow removal of first record in file Fixed bug in map_addhmb when specifying custom boundary latitude Fixed bug in make_grid preventing custom start times with -i flag Fixed bugs in AACGM_v2 software Fixed numerous plotting bugs Updated Falkland Islands and Stokkseyri hdw.dat files Updated README and documentation for FITACF 3.0 Updated documentation following the -new/-old flag change from previous release (4.1) Cleanup of numerous warning messages during compilation The RST is actively developed and maintained by the SuperDARN Data Analysis Working Group (https://superdarn.github.io/dawg/).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.228
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6050.833

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)French-language works237,207