MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6911785384 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.1403226

SuperDARN Radar Software Toolkit (RST) 4.2

2018· other· en· W6911785384 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2018
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoftwareDocumentationAliasDebuggingRadarBoundary (topology)Data fileReading (process)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New features in version 4.2 of the Radar Software Toolkit (RST) include: TS18 and TS18-Kp statistical convection model (TS18 replacing CS10 as default) Statistical convection model solver (solve_model) Added pre-1900 coefficients for use with AACGM_v2 Implemented new --version option to print current RST version number Added unrecognized command line option handling to remaining binaries Disabled low-power thresholding when converting between dat and rawacf format files Fixed bug when reading data from early (~1993-1995) dat format files Fixed bug when reading records with negative scan flag values Fixed bugs in gridtogrdmap and maptocnvmap conversion routines Fixed bug in trim_fit to allow removal of first record in file Fixed bug in map_addhmb when specifying custom boundary latitude Fixed bug in make_grid preventing custom start times with -i flag Fixed bugs in AACGM_v2 software Fixed numerous plotting bugs Updated Falkland Islands and Stokkseyri hdw.dat files Updated README and documentation for FITACF 3.0 Updated documentation following the -new/-old flag change from previous release (4.1) Cleanup of numerous warning messages during compilation The RST is actively developed and maintained by the SuperDARN Data Analysis Working Group (https://superdarn.github.io/dawg/).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.163
Threshold uncertainty score0.546

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0060.004
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1630.179

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)French-language works237,207