Bibliographic record
Abstract
146 Euura clitellata group sp. 1 Fig. 374 A single male (ZMUO.035580) from Utsjoki (Finland) is clearly a different species from the others in the group, based on nuclear DNA. The penis valve is not clearly distinguishable from E. clitellata, but externally (colouration and the projection of tergite 8) it is most similar to E. fallax. Of the North American species treated by Ross (1945), ZMUO.035580 is perhaps most similar (based on the penis valve and the projection of tergite 8) to Euura aurata (Marlatt 1896a: 91–93, 99–100) (Pachynematus auratus Marlatt, 1896), but the characters do not seem to fit perfectly. The dominant COI variant belongs to BOLD:ACF0333 (most European E. clitellata specimens), the second to BOLD:ACM0632 (North America) and the third is closest (2.4%) to BOLD:ABX5515 (North America and some secondary variants of several Finnish specimens of E. clitellata). Host plants Unknown. Genetics COI Only one sequence available. The nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 0.15%, is Euura clitellata (nuclear clusters 3 and 5). When secondary intraindividual COI variants of ZMUO.035580 are also included, maximum within species distance is 2.89% and the nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 0.15%, is Euura clitellata (E. clitellata s. str. and nuclear clusters 3–5). Nuclear Only one sequence available. The nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 1.43%, is Euura moerens. Distribution and material examined Palaearctic. The studied specimen is from northernmost Finland.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".