Bandura's Social Learning Theory & Social Cognitive Learning Theory
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Albert Bandura is known as the father of cognitive theory. He was born December 4, 1925 in a small town in northern Alberta, Canada, located approximately 50 miles from Edmonton. Bandura’s early education consisted of one small school with only two teachers. (Stokes, 1986). Albert Bandura soon became fascinated by psychology after enrolling at the University of British Columbia. He had started out at biological sciencesmajor, his interest in psychology formed quite by accident. He was working nights and commuting to school with a group of students who arrived much earlier than his other courses started. ( Pajares, 2004). In 1949 he graduated from the University of British Columbia with a degree in Psychology. He received his Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology from the University of Iowain 1952. After he finished his PhD because of his famous studies and searches Bandura was elected as the president of the American Psychological Association in 1974. He was also elected as the outstanding lifetime contribution to Psychology, AmericanPsychological Association in 2004. Among all scholars Bandura was known as the father of the Cognitive Theory. (Bandura, 2006a).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.301 | 0.050 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it