Bibliographic record
Abstract
CLERUCHUS Enock, 1909 (Figs 81–86) Cleruchus Enock, 1909: 453. Type species: Cleruchus pluteus Enock, 1909, by monotypy. See Huber et al. (2020) for generic synonyms and their type species. Diagnosis. Head more or less produced anteriorly, in lateral view almost triangular; face with faint subantennal sulci (Fig.81a); ocelli forming a low triangle with lateral ocelli close to posterolateral corners of vertex (Fig. 86); funicle segments often about as long as wide and clava 1-segmented (Fig. 82); fore wing narrow, parallel sided (Fig. 83); ovipositor short, usually originating in apical half or less of gaster (Fig. 85). Remarks. Cleruchus belongs to the Cleruchus group of genera. It differs from Cleruchoides mainly in having the funicle segments often quadrate and a narrower fore wing. It differs from Platystethynium by the scutellum not longitudinally divided medially and the propodeum without Y-like submedian sulci. Cleruchus usually has the clava entire whereas Platystethynium has it 2-segmented (3-segmented in some extralimital species). Neotropical hosts. Unknown. Important reference. Huber & Triapitsyn (2017).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".