The Development Mode and Development Strategy of Sino-Foreigncooperation on the Education in Local Universities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract : This study explores the evolution and dynamics of Sino-foreign cooperation in Chinese universities, delineating its historical progression through three distinct stages. Beginning in the 1980s, collaborative initiatives with the United States, Japan, Germany, France, Britain, Canada, and Hong Kong laid the foundation for subsequent developments. The shift towards prioritizing academic education, particularly in professional fields, marked the second stage (1995-2003). The third stage (2003-present) witnessed continuous improvement, increased scale, and the integration of modern educational means, including online and distance education. The study employs qualitative analysis, utilizing interviews with four managers of Sino-foreign cooperative schools. The objectives of the study are to understand the meaning of Sino-foreign cooperation, discuss the tendency of the development mode of Sino-foreign cooperation and suggest the development of Sino-foreign cooperation on education. Results reveal the diverse perspectives on the meaning of Sino-foreign cooperation, emphasizing leadership roles, negotiation skills, curriculum design, and teaching methods. Preferences for development modes vary among respondents, with some favoring joint courses for systematic professional knowledge, and others preferring independent colleges for systematic planning, and the choice is influenced by factors like student numbers. Suggestions for future development include designing attractive courses, fostering active student participation, providing cross-cultural training, establishing a stricter quality assurance system, and ensuring compliance with international cooperation policies and regulations. In conclusion, the study provides insights into the historical progression and current dynamics of Sino-foreign cooperation in education. The recommendations underscore the need for a holistic approach, considering student engagement, cultural competence, and adherence to international standards to ensure sustainable and effective collaboration in education.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".