Bibliographic record
Abstract
Coproica rufifrons Hayashi, 1991 Figs. 7, 20, 27, 244–254 Coproica rufifrons Hayashi, 1991 c: 237 [both sexes, phylogenetic notes, illustr.]. Type locality: Pakistan, Chilas. HT male (ITLJ). Description. As in Coproica hirtula with the following exceptions. Body length 1.1–1.9 mm. Anterior 1/5 of frons orange. Interfrontal bristles in 4–5 subequal pairs. Second costal sector 0.7–1.1 times as long as third costal sector. Male terminalia: Cercus with rounded medial process along ventral margin, and 1 enlarged bristle. Surstylus with 2 posteroventral processes, each medially deflected, posterior-most process pointed and 2 times as long as other process, with ventral row of 5 or more bristles. Distiphallus with lateral sclerites rounded, with medial process and small lateral warts; central sclerite narrowly fused with lateral sclerites subapically, with elongate apical process. Membranes elongate, narrow, with lightly sclerotized ridges. Female terminalia: Sternite 8 rounded anteriorly, nearly as wide as sternite 7, with posteromedial notch. Spermathecae spherical; duct length 7–8 times as long as spermathecal bulb. Type material. Holotype male: PAKISTAN: Northwest Frontier Prov., Chilas, 2.ix.1988, T. Hayashi (ITLJ, not examined). Paratypes (all individuals listed here were examined): PAKISTAN: Northwest Frontier Prov., Ayubia, 22.vii.1988, T. Hayashi (1♀); Northwest Frontier Prov., Balakot, 2.viii.1988, T. Hayashi (4♂ *); Northwest Frontier Prov., Chilas, 2.ix.1988, T. Hayashi (4♂, 4♀); Northwest Frontier Prov., Kalam, Swat, 6–8.viii.1988, T. Hayashi (1♀); Northwest Frontier Prov., Miandam, Swat, 3.viii.1988, T. Hayashi (3♂); Northwest Frontier Prov., Shangla Pass, 9.viii.1988, T. Hayashi (4♀). Other material examined. See Appendix A. Distribution: Afrotropical: Yemen; Australasian/Oceanian: American Samoa, Australia (QLD), Cook Is., Fiji, French Polynesia (Tahiti), Kiribati, Marshall Is., Micronesia (Kapingamarangi, Satawa Is., Yap Is.), Palau, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Is., Tonga, Vanuatu, Western Samoa; Nearctic: Canada (NS [data suspect]), USA (FL, NY [data suspect], TX); Neotropical: Argentina, Bermuda, Brazil,?Bolivia, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Galápagos Is. (Ecuador), Grenada, Guatemala, Jamaica,?Mexico, St. Kitts, Trinidad, Virgin Is.; Oriental: China (HKG), Japan (Okinawa), Pakistan, Taiwan; Palaearctic: Afghanistan, Canary Is. (Spain), China (BEI), Croatia, Germany, Greece (Crete), Hungary, Italy, Japan, Madeira (Portugal), Malta, Saudia Arabia, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates. Comments. Coproica rufifrons is widespread and abundant in northern South America and the southern United States, and is the most common species of Coproica collected on the Galapagos Islands. Two specimens examined had label data indicating occurrences well north of the main range of this species: one from New York and the other from Nova Scotia. Coproica rufifrons can be distinguished from C. hirtula by the orange anterior margin of the frons, and the presence of a pair of posterior processes on the surstylus (Fig. 245). Twenty-one paratypes were examined including four males and four females belonging to the holotype series. The holotype was not examined, as we are confident that the examined paratypes are conspecific with the holotype. See also comments under Coproica hirtula.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".