MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6911863915 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.13835890

Dallirhytis Kruglov & Starobogatov 1989

2024· article· en· W6911863915 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTaxonSpire (mollusc)GenusRange (aeronautics)GastropodaPenis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Genus Dallirhytis Kruglov & Starobogatov, 1989 Kruglov and Starobogatov 1989: 15. aNon-native species. Type species: Lymnaea petersi Dall, 1905 = Limnaea ovata var. atkaensis Dall, 1884 (by original designation). Diagnosis: Shell medium in size, ovate-conical to almost ear-shaped, with well-developed acute spire (Fig. 3A, B). Whorls are conspicuously inflated. Praeputium cylindrical, oblong, dark-pigmented; penis sheath rather short and compact; its length is 2.5–3.0 less than the praeputium length (Fig. 4A). Penis with a (rudimentary) ring-shaped fixing swelling [Walter (1969) calls it the ‘penial knot’]; prostate with a single internal fold. Species richness: This is a monotypic genus. In addition to Dallirhytis atkaensis, Kruglov and Starobogatov (1989, 1993) listed another species, Lymnaea petersi Dall, 1905. However, we synonymize both species based on examination of samples of Ly. petersi kept in ZIN. We found that the conchological variability of Ly. petersi falls within the range of variability of D. atkaensis. The ranges of both taxa as accepted byKruglov and Starobogatov (1993) overlap almost completely. Dallirhytis atkaensis has a very characteristic shell appearance and can hardly be confused with another pond snail species of Beringia. Distribution: A Beringian taxon known from Alaska, the Yukon Territory, northern British Columbia, and the Chukchi Peninsula (Burch 1989, Kruglov 2005, Aksenova et al. 2023).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior→French-language works237,207→