Friesea sublimis MacNamara 1922
Bibliographic record
Abstract
42. Friesea sublimis MacNamara, 1922 Friesea sublimis MacNamara, 1922: 128. Distribution in Vietnam. In forest, shrubland, grassland, cultivated land, garden, urban soil. Northwest: Hòa Bình (Yên Thủy). Lào Cai (Hoàng Liên national park; Sa Pa). Sõn La (Chiềng Đông; Cò Mạ; Cò Nòi). Northeast: Bắc Giang (Hiệp Hòa). Bắc Kạn (Na Rì). Cao Bằng (Vân Trình). Phú Thọ (Xuân Sõn national park). Quảng Ninh (Cẩm Phả; Uông Bí). Tuyên Quang (Na Hang natural reserve). Red River Delta: Hà Nam (Phủ Lý). Hà Nội (Ba Vì national park; Ðan PhýỢng; Đống Ða, Hoàn Kiếm, Hai Bà Trýng, Thanh Xuân, Cầu Giấy, Tây Hồ, Sóc Sõn, Từ Liêm, Gia Lâm, Thanh Trì, Đông; Mê Linh; Sõn Tây; Thanh Trì; Từ Liêm; Yên Hòa, Trung Hòa). Hải Dýõng (Hải Dýõng). Hải Phòng (Cát Bà island; Cát Bà national park; Tiên Lãng). Hýng Yên (Ân Thi; Đông Mai; Chỉ Đạo; Hýng Yên; Kim Động). Nam Định (Nam Thịnh; Nam Trực; Ý Yên; Mỹ Lộc; Vụ Bản). Ninh Bình (Cúc Phýõng; Kim Sõn). Thái Bình (Thái Bình). Vĩnh Phúc (Đại Lải; Mê Linh Biodiversity Station; Tam Đảo national park; Vinh Yen). North Central Coast: Hà Tĩnh. Quảng Bình. Quảng Trị (Đa Krông natural reserve; Triệu Phong). Thanh Hóa. Thừa Thiên Huế (A Lý ới). South Central Coast: Quảng Nam (Chà Vàl village). Central Highlands: Kon Tum (Chý Mom Ray national park). Southeast: Đồng Nai (Cát Tiên national park). Mekong River Delta: Cà Mau. Cần Thõ (Cần Thõ). Authorship. RD: Nguyễn T.T. 1994, 2017; Stach 1965. TN: Nguyễn T.T. et al. 2015. EC: Dýõng T.T. et al. 2010; Nguyễn H.T. & Nguyễn T.T. 2011a,b; Nguyễn T.T.A. 2013; Nguyễn T.T.A. et al. 2013a,b, 2005a, 2005c; Nguyễn T.T.A. & Nguyễn H.L. 2013; Nguyễn T.T.A. & Nguyễn T.T. 2004, Nguyễn T.T. 1995a, 2005b,c; Nguyễn T.T. & Nguyễn H.T. 2011; Nguyễn T.T. & Nguyễn T.T.A. 2001a,b, 2003, 2004; Nguyễn T.T. et al. 1997, 1999, 2007b; Nguyễn T.T. & Nguyễn V.Q. 2011; Nguyễn T.T. & Pomorski 2002; Nguyễn V.Q. & Nguyễn T.T. 2014; Vũ T.L. et al. 2005; Výõng T.H. et al. 2007. CI: Nguyễn H.L. et al. 2013; Nguyễn T.T.A. 2009; Nguyễn T.T.A. & Lê Q.D. 2011; Nguyễn T.T.A. & Nguyễn Đ.A.2017; Nguyễn T.T.A. & Nguyễn T.T. 2005b; Nguyễn T.T.A. et al. 2002, 2021; Nguyễn T.T. 1995c, 2002a, 2003a; Nguyễn T.T. et al. 2005, 2008, 2011; Nguyễn T.T. & Nguyễn T.T.A. 2000a,b; Nguyễn T.T. & Vũ Q.M. 2001; Trýõng H.Ð. et al. 2015; Vũ Q.M. & Nguyễn T.T. 2000. CAT: Nguyễn T.T. & Vũ Q.M. 1993. Type locality. Arnprior, Ontario (Canada). General distribution. Potentially cosmopolitan species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.200 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".