Bibliographic record
Abstract
Triepeolus alvarengai Moure, 1955 Fig. 13A Triepeolus alvarengai Moure, 1955: 126 (♀). Triepeolus alvarengai – Onuferko et al. 2024: 7, figs 1a, 2, 3a (redescription of female, description of male). Proposed common name Alvarenga’s triepeolus. Diagnosis The following morphological features in combination tell T. alvarengai apart from all other Triepeolus in the simplex species group: the mesoscutum has well-defined paramedian bands (Fig. 13A); the T1 basal band is arched, continuous with (and indistinguishable from) the lateral longitudinal bands, and mesally concave on each side, such that the discal patch is semicircular (Fig. 13A); the T1 apical transverse band (if present) is not more narrowly interrupted medially than the basal band (Fig. 13A); and T2–T4 have complete apical transverse bands of yellow tomentum that are about as broad as (if not broader than) the bands on T1 and do not have basomedially convergent anterolateral extensions (Fig. 13A). Specimens in which T1 has only a basal band or pair of anterolateral patches of pale tomentum (as opposed to both basal and apical transverse bands) may be confused with T. mexicanus or T. nemoralis, but in T. mexicanus pale tomentum on the mesoscutum is restricted to the lateral and posterior margins and in T. nemoralis the mesoscutum has a large anteromedial ovate patch of yellow tomentum, which may be sparser medially such that the patch is suggestive of ill-defined paramedian bands. Specimens in which T1 has an apical transverse band may be confused with T. eumeniformis sp. nov., but in T. eumeniformis the T1 basal band (if present) is more widely interrupted medially than the apical transverse band. Additionally, T. alvarengai can easily be separated from T. eumeniformis and T. mexicanus by geography; the former is known only from Brazil whereas the latter two species are known only from North and Central America. Etymology See Onuferko et al. (2024). Material examined See Onuferko et al. (2024). DNA barcoded material Unavailable. Redescription This species was recently redescribed (Onuferko et al. 2024). Distribution Eastern Brazil (Onuferko et al. 2024: fig. 1a). Ecology Host records Unknown. Floral records Unknown. Remarks Detailed morphological and taxonomic remarks about this species are given in Onuferko et al. (2024).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".