Bibliographic record
Abstract
OMYOMYMAR Schauff, 1983 (Figs 218–230) Omyomymar Schauff, 1983: 544. Type species: Paranaphoidea silvana Ogloblin, 1935, by original designation. See Huber et al. (2020) for the generic synonym and its type species. Diagnosis. Face with faint or without subantennal sulcus ventral to each torulus and a median sulcus extending ventrally from transverse trabecula to about dorsal margin of a torulus; torulus about 1.4× its own height from transverse trabecula (Figs 218a, 224a); mandibles short, their apices not or barely extending to each other when closed (Figs 218a, 224a); gena in lateral view short; clava 2-segmented, the apical segment with a nipple-like projection in O. (Omyomymar) (Fig. 219) or with a slight apical constriction in O. (Caenomymar) (Fig. 226); ovipositor usually distinctly exserted beyond apex of gaster (Figs 223, 229), basally forming a huge loop inside gaster of O. (Caenomymar) (Fig. 230). Male flagellum 11-segmented (Fig. 227); mandibles large, crossing when closed, with 2 distinct ventral teeth of equal size and a wide, apically serrate dorsal tooth (Fig. 225); scape with inner surface with a few to many spine-like projections in O. (Omyomymar) or transversely striate in O. (Caenomymar) (Fig. 225). Remarks. Omyomymar belongs to the Anagrus group of genera. The strongly dimorphic head also occurs in Krokella; in both genera the mandibles are very different between the sexes. Caenomymar is at present a synonym of Omyomymar but its species could perhaps best be classified informally in a separate species group from those in O. (Omyomymar); O. (Caenomymar) species are larger than those in O. (Omyomymar) and the clava does not have a distinct apical nipple. Neotropical hosts. Unknown. Important reference. Huber et al. (2020).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.086 | 0.029 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".