Bibliographic record
Abstract
173 Euura melanocephalus (Hartig, 1837) Figs 193, 422 Tenthredo salicis Retzius, 1783: 72. Described by indication on Degeer (1771: pl. 37 figs 12–22). Syntypes ♀ ♂ and larvae [probably lost / destroyed]. Type locality: Sweden. Primary homonym of Tenthredo salicis Linnaeus, 1758 [= Euura salicis (Linnaeus, 1758)]. Nematus melanocephalus Hartig, 1837: 219. Described based on the German translation by Götze (1779) of Degeer (1771). Syntypes ♀ ♂ and larvae [probably lost /destroyed]. Type locality: Sweden. Nematus perspicillaris Hartig, 1840: 24. Lectotype designated below. Synonymy by Kriechbaumer (1884). Nematus pyrrhonotus Zaddach, 1883 in Brischke 1883: 130–131. Syntypes ♀♀ (NMW), not examined. Type locality: Austria, Vienna area. Synonymy by Konow (1905b) with Pteronus dimidiatus Konow nec Lepeletier [E. melanocephalus]. Pteronus xanthostomus Rohwer, 1910: 91. Lectotype designated below. Synonymy by Liston et al. (2006). Pteronidea melanocephala var. mesothoracica Enslin, 1916a: 414. Syntypes ♂♂. Types have not been located. Type locality: not stated. Synonymy by Lacourt (1999). Diagnosis Black pterostigma, pale costa, lancet (radix shorter than lamnium, 19–20 serrulae), and colouration of the abdomen (completely yellow) distinguish female E. melanocephalus from the other Euura. Similar is also Nematus umbratus, but it has fewer serrulae (13–16(17?)). If stable, the extensively pale mesepisternum of E. melanocephalus males might distinguish them from the other species in the group. Mostly pale, pterostigma black, claws bifid, valvula 3 rather broad, hardly tapered, and with small invagination posteriorly. Type material examined Lectotype Nematus perspicillaris, here designated GERMANY • ♀; northern Germany [according to Hartig 1840: 22]; ZSM, DEI-GISHym 3377. Lectotype Pteronus xanthostomus, here designated NETHERLANDS – Noord-Brabant • ♀; Gemert; 51.56° N, 5.70° E; USNM, USNMENT00779592, http://n 2t.net/ark:/65665/3eaf2ca2a-e822-48ff-ad47-f5aefe11b4f9. Notes Liston et al. (2006) incorrectly wrote that USNMENT00779592 is the holotype. According to archive sources at the USNM, several other sawfly specimens were reared from the same batch of cocoons, but only this single specimen was preserved. However, the information in Rohwer (1915) only allows the assumption that the original description was based on syntypes. Host plants Salix fragilis (Urban 1999), Corylus avellana L., Ulmus sp. (based on ex larva reared specimens). Populus and Betula have also been recorded (reviewed in Urban 1999). Larvae reared ex ovo from Salix fragilis did accept Ulmus L., Corylus L. and Populus in the presence of Salix fragilis (although with clearly lower preference), but Betula was accepted only when no other food was available (Urban 1999). Two generations per year in central Europe (Urban 1999). Genetics COI Based on 2 specimens, the maximum within-species distance is 0% and the nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 2.13%, is Euura ferruginea. Nuclear Based on 1774 bp of NaK and EF1a F2, only one specimen available. The nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 0.39%, is Euura kangasi. Distribution and material examined Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Austria, Belgium, Finland, and Germany.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.075 | 0.031 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".