Webshop prototype for behaviour change interventions for sustainable logistics choices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This document presents the development and implementation of a webshop prototype aimed at encouraging sustainable delivery choices through digital behaviour change techniques (BCTs). More broadly, this prototype serves to fulfil the SuCoLo project’s objectives, which seeks to promote sustainable logistics solutions in urban outskirts by leveraging psychological models of behaviour change and inclusive cargo-bike logistics. The prototype builds on prior research (e.g., D3.1 Scientific publication of reviewed behaviour change techniques for sustainable logistics and Supplemental Report: Best practices catalogue of behaviour change techniques to encourage sustainable consumer delivery choices) that reviewed and catalogued effective BCTs for influencing consumer behaviour toward green delivery options. These interventions include strategies like providing information about environmental impacts, social comparisons, material incentives, restructuring digital environments to "nudge" users toward sustainable choices, and more. In the same vein, co-creation activities with webshop owners and consumers were also incorporated to ensure the solutions are practical and widely adoptable. This webshop underwent several development iterations, and now several variations of it with different BCTs will be tested among an Austrian sample. You can access a copy of the UX and customer journey of the webshop prototypes utilised in this study here: https://zenodo.org/records/15180498
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".