MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6912069425 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15021139

Euura ribesii

2025· article· en· W6912069425 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicParasite Biology and Host Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeHomonym (biology)Type (biology)Taxonomy (biology)Type species

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

273 Euura ribesii (Scopoli, 1763) Figs 217, 509 Tenthredo ribesii Scopoli, 1763: 280. Syntypes ♂♂ and larvae (lost or destroyed). Type locality: Slovenia, Carniola [Kranjska]. Nematus trimaculatus Serville, 1823: 71. Syntypes ♀♀ (no type material located: Lacourt 2000). Type locality: North of France. Synonymy by Dalla Torre (1894). Nematus dimidiatus Serville, 1823: 70–71. Lectotype ♀ (MNHN), designated by Lacourt (2000), not examined. Type locality: France, Ile-de-France, Paris. Synonymy by Enslin (1916a). Nematus ribesii Stephens, 1829: 329. Syntypes ♀ ♂, larvae (no type material located). Type locality: United Kingdom, England. Synonymy by Dalla Torre (1894). Secondary homonym of Tenthredo ribesii Scopoli, 1763 [Euura ribesii (Scopoli, 1763)]. Tenthredo ventricosa Bouché, 1834: 140. Syntype larvae (no type material located). Type locality: not stated. Synonymy by Dalla Torre (1894). Nematus grossulariae Dahlbom, 1835a: 22–23. Syntype larvae (adults reared, but not described). No syntypes found in MZLU: a specimen from Dahlbom’s collection cannot be a syntype, because according to the label the female emerged in May 25 in 1835, while according to the original description the reared adults emerged in April. Type locality: Sweden. Synonymy by Dalla Torre (1894). Nematus grossulariatus Dahlbom, 1835a: 25. Type locality: Sweden, Skåne. Holotype not found in MZLU. Synonymy by Dalla Torre (1894). Nematus ventricosus Hartig, 1837: 196–197. Syntypes ♀ ♂ (according to Hartig in ZMHB: not located). Type locality: not stated. Synonymy by Dalla Torre (1894). Nematus flavipes Hartig, 1840: 24. Lectotype designated below. Synonymy by Konow (1905b). Primary homonym of Nematus flavipes Dahlbom, 1835 [Pristiphora appendiculata (Hartig, 1837)]. Nematus xanthophorus Hartig, 1840: 25. Syntypes, sex not stated, not located. Type locality: northern Germany. Synonymy by Konow (1903b). Nematus ribis Leduc, 1842: 46, 48, pls 1–2. Syntypes ♀ ♂, larva, pupa. No type material is known to exist. Type locality: France, Seine-et-Oise. Synonymy by Taeger et al. (2010). Tenthredo grossulariae Fischer von Waldheim, 1843: 2. Syntypes, sex not stated. No type material is known to exist. Type locality: Russia. Synonymy by Dalla Torre (1894). Primary homonym of Tenthredo (Emphytus) grossulariae Klug, 1818 [Ametastegia (Protemphytus) pallipes (Spinola, 1808)]. Pteronus longicornis Marlatt, 1896a: 44–46 (key), 72. Secondary homonym of Nematus longicornis Eschscholtz, 1822 (incertae sedis). Pteronus arapahonum Cockerell, 1906: 220. Syntypes (3 ♂♂) (USNMENT00778028, USNM, http://n 2t.net/ark:/65665/3c9dcf78c-4891-4bb4-8fe8-b65d3cc54874), not examined. Type locality: USA, Colorado, Boulder. Pteronidea aceris Rohwer, 1915: 211. Holotype ♀ (USNMENT00778631, USNM, http://n 2t.net/ ark:/65665/3df27021b-df45-4a52-b962-faf9ad8c1013), not examined. Type locality: USA, Pennsylvania, Charter Oak. Synonymy by Ross (1951). Pteronidea ribesii var. konowi Enslin, 1916a: 420. Lectotype designated below. Synonymy by Smith (1979). Secondary homonym of Pteronus konowi Jakowlew, 1891 [= Euura konowi (Jakowlew, 1891), incertae sedis]. Pteronidea ribesii var. feminina Enslin, 1916a: 419. Lectotype designated below. Synonymy by Smith (1979). Pteronidea equatia MacGillivray, 1923a: 30. Holotype ♂ (INHS), not examined. Type locality: USA, Oregon, Corvallis. Synonymy by Ross (1951). Diagnosis Large subapical tooth (broad and as long as apical tooth), costa as black as pterostigma along most of its length (only approximately basal quarter paler), typically mostly pale flagellum, and typically completely pale abdomen distinguish the females from the others in the group. Subapical tooth is somewhat or distinctly smaller and costa is in most cases paler in the other species of the group. Viitasaari (1980) suggested that the tip of valvula 3 in lateral view is blunt in E. ribesii compared to other species, but we did not observe any consistent differences between the species. Males are best recognised by the prominent and broad projection of tergite 8 that is slightly constricted at its base, dorsally mostly black abdomen and, as in females, the mostly black costa. Type material examined Lectotype Nematus flavipes, here designated GERMANY • ♂; northern Germany [according to Hartig 1840: 22]; ZSM, GBIF-GISHym3686. Syntype Pteronus longicornis USA – Michigan • ♂; Ingham, Agricultural College; 42.746° N, 84.483° W; USNM, USNMENT00778536, http://n 2t.net/ark:/65665/320572933-77a7-4e85-bbc7-8e6e65c4e5e0. Lectotype Pteronidea ribesii var. konowi, here designated GERMANY – Bayern • ♀; Fränkischer Jura; E. Enslin leg.; ZSM, GBIF-GISHym3322. Lectotype Pteronidea ribesii var. feminina, here designated COUNTRY UNKNOWN • ♂; [label illegible]; ZSM, GBIF-GISHym3274. Host plants Ribes spp.: most frequently R. rubrum and R. uva-crispa, only rarely on R. nigrum (Viitasaari 1980). Larvae gregarious. Genetics COI Based on 8 specimens, maximum within-species distance is 0.46% and the nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 3.8%, is Euura leucotrocha. Nuclear Based on 4 specimens, maximum within-species distance is 0% (0.12% based on haplotypes of individual females). The nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 0.53%, is Euura leucotrocha. Distribution and material examined Holarctic. Specimens studied are from Austria, Canada (only genetics), Finland, Germany, Norway, and the United Kingdom.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.138

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0410.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicParasite Biology and Host Interactions→French-language works237,207→