假说:意识通过信息场驱动物理规则、命运 结构与宇宙创造:兼论玄学可验证性(Hypothesis: Consciousness drives physical rules, destiny structure and cosmic creation through information field: Also on the verifiability of metaphysics)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
论框架,基于KLH25数字生命框架(21种神经元类型,95%记忆保留率,90%情感一致性)和现实镜像元宇宙(全规则仿真,95%时空一致性)的实验发现。提出四个假说:(1)意识通过信息场调整量子生成与物理化学规则;2)意识影响的物理结构塑造生命体行为与行为、思维形成体系;3)现实宇宙可能为人工创造,类似元宇宙设计;4)命运学现象为意识对规则的异常影响,可实验验证。实验基于KLH25基础结构,在人工生命(AL)训练和元宇宙路径验证中发现偏差(量子波动10%、化学速率偏差5%、行为偏倚离8%、规则异常3%),初步支持假说。论文通过细化的理论模型、实验数据及偏差分 解析、探讨意识的多维度影响,为数字生命、元宇宙及跨学科研究提供新视角。
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".