MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912136792 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15240034

假说:意识通过信息场驱动物理规则、命运 结构与宇宙创造:兼论玄学可验证性(Hypothesis: Consciousness drives physical rules, destiny structure and cosmic creation through information field: Also on the verifiability of metaphysics)

2025· preprint· zh· W6912136792 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languagezh
FieldMedicine
TopicBiofield Effects and Biophysics
Canadian institutionsFuture Earth
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConsciousnessDestiny (ISS module)FatalismKey (lock)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

论框架,基于KLH25数字生命框架(21种神经元类型,95%记忆保留率,90%情感一致性)和现实镜像元宇宙(全规则仿真,95%时空一致性)的实验发现。提出四个假说:(1)意识通过信息场调整量子生成与物理化学规则;2)意识影响的物理结构塑造生命体行为与行为、思维形成体系;3)现实宇宙可能为人工创造,类似元宇宙设计;4)命运学现象为意识对规则的异常影响,可实验验证。实验基于KLH25基础结构,在人工生命(AL)训练和元宇宙路径验证中发现偏差(量子波动10%、化学速率偏差5%、行为偏倚离8%、规则异常3%),初步支持假说。论文通过细化的理论模型、实验数据及偏差分 解析、探讨意识的多维度影响,为数字生命、元宇宙及跨学科研究提供新视角。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.623
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it