Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alloperla concolor Ricker (Figs. 6-10) Alloperla concolor Ricker, 1935:256. Holotype ♂ (Royal Ontario Museum), Ontario, Dufferin Co., "E" Creek, headwaters of Pine River, Horning's Mills Material examined. Newfoundland: Rocky Brook, north of Deer Lake, Reidville Road, 8 June 1998, B.C. Kondratieff, R. W. Baumann, 56♂, 3♀, 5 larval skins from field associated adults, 1 pharate male larva (CSU). Boot Brook, Hwy 1 jct Hwy 401, northeast of Deer Lake, 8 June 1998, B.C. Kondratieff, R. W. Baumann, 5 larvae (CSU). Mature larva. Body length 9.0- 9.5 mm. General color brown without distinctive pattern. Head slightly paler forward of median ocellus (Fig. 6). Anterior pronotal margin with about 11-15 moderately long setae at corners and posterior margin with 2 long and 2 short setae at corners (Fig. 6). Mesonotal wingpads with ca. 12-16 outer marginal setae, metanotal wingpads with ca. 20 outer marginal setae beyond apex of mesonotal wingpad; inner marginal setae apparently absent (Fig. 7). All legs with sparse ventral tibial fringes (Fig. 9). Abdominal terga without mesal pale spots; posterior fringes on terga 8-9 with ca. 6 long thin setae and mixed shorter thick setae primarily located laterad to innermost long setae (Fig. 8); mesal section of posterior fringe occupied by a few very thin setae. Abdominal intercalary setae restricted to lateral areas of segments. Cerci consisting of 15 apparent segments, vertical fringe developed on segments 10-15 (Fig. 10); longest dorsal setae in segmental whorls of mid cercal segments about as long as segment. Comments. The larva of this species was previously described by Fiance (1977) from Hubbard Book, New Hampshire specimens. Figure 2C of that publication shows a lateral view of the cercus with 18 apparent segments and the vertical fringe present on segments 12-18. Although this is at variance with our specimens, in all other respects our findings are in agreement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".