Bibliographic record
Abstract
Campoletis sonorensis Parasitoid success of C. sonorensis was similar on T. ni and C. chalcites (F 1,18 = 1.28, P = 0.273; Fig. 1). Host success and host mortality were higher amongst parasitised T. ni than amongst C. chalcites, but parasitoid cocoon mortality was lower (F 1,18 = 8.05, P = 0.011; F 1,11.38 = 25.07, P <0.001; F 1,10.61 = 12.68; P = 0.005, respectively; Fig. 1). Host mortality was higher amongst parasitised T. ni than amongst nonparasitised T. ni (F 1,18 = 7.31, P = 0.015; Means ± SE: 4.00 ± 0.73 and 1.80 ± 0.36 dead larvae, respectively), but for C. chalcites, host mortality amongst parasitised larvae was similar to that amongst nonparasitised larvae (F 1,18 = 1.16, P = 0.296; Means ± SE: 1.60 ± 0.43 and 2.20 ± 0.36 dead larvae, respectively). The host success of parasitised hosts was mostly associated with the cuticular encystment of parasitoid eggs (Vinson and Iwantsch 1980b; Namba et al. 2004). On more than 50% of the surviving parasitised hosts, host larvae were observed moving the parasitoid eggs from the insertion locations in their bodies to the ends of their bodies, then isolating the eggs in bubble-like extensions that developed on top of the hosts’ last abdominal segments. Multinomial logistic regression indicated a difference in the interaction of host success (Wald = 17.545; df = 1; P = 0.001), host mortality (Wald = 10.995; df = 1; P = 0.001), and parasitoid cocoon mortality (Wald = 14.798; df = 1; P = 0.001) with parasitoid success between parasitised T. ni and C. chalcites by C. sonorensis. The success of C. sonorensis declined more on T. ni than on C. chalcites with the increase of host success (Coefficient = 2.577) and host mortality (Coefficient = 1.066); however, it declined less than on C. chalcites with the increase of parasitoid cocoon mortality (Coefficient = − 1.555). The development times from oviposition to cocoon formation, cocoon to adult emergence, and oviposition to adult emergence of C. sonorensis reared on T. ni were shorter than on C. chalcites (U = 1562.50, P <0.001; U = 6567.00, P = 0.010; U = 1900.50, P <0.001, respectively; Fig. 2). The mean sex ratio was slightly female-biased on T. ni (0.48 ± 0.08) and male-biased on C. chalcites (0.66 ± 0.08), but not significantly different between them (F 1,18 = 2.65, P = 0.121).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".