Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anochetus graeffei Mayr, 1870 Material examined. Kent Ridge Park, 7 Dec 2017, W. Wang leg.,WW-SG17-027, ZRC _ ENT00000979; workers and dealate queen, same locality as previous, 7 Dec 2017, Sk. Yamane leg., SG17-SKY-21 (SKYC); Nee Soon forest, 27 Jan 2015, W. Wang leg., WW-SG15- Anoc 1, ZRC _ ENT00000978; male, Pulau Semakau Old Fragment, SMO3, 1°12’23.9”N, 103°45’37.6”E, 5-12 Jul 2012, J. Puniamoorthy et al. leg., mangroves, malaise trap, Reg. 29342, ZRC _ BDP0014528; queens and males, Pulau Ubin, PU 1, 1°24’36.3”N, 103°59’25.5”E, Jul-Nov 2012, J. Puniamoorthy et al. leg., mangroves, malaise trap, ZRC _ BDP (multiple); male, Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve, SB1, 1°26›46.3»N, 103°43›49.9»E, 21-28 Nov 2012, J. Puniamoorthy et al. leg., mangroves, malaise trap, Reg. 29595, ZRC _ BDP0017502; Upper Thomson Road, 24 Oct 2016, G.W. Yong leg., ZRC _ ENT00048414. Material not physically examined. ANIC 32- 015989, Shattuck1345236804 (ANIC). Literature. Viehmeyer (1916), Overbeck (1924) [both as Anochetus punctiventris]. Shattuck & Slipinska (2012). Localities. Kent Ridge Park; Labrador Nature Reserve; Nee Soon forest; Pulau Semakau; Pulau Ubin; Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve; Upper Thomson Road. Habitat/Ecology. Workers of this species were found in a garden, semi-urban parklands, young secondary forest and also Imperata cylindrica- dominated grassy scrub. Nests have been collected from dead twigs in leaf litter. Alates were collected from mangroves using malaise traps. Remarks. This species is known to exhibit broad morphological variation between different populations, and may actually comprise a complex of multiple sibling species. In this checklist, we tentatively treat all morphological variants of this potential species complex in the ZRC as conspecific, bearing in mind the possibility that these might be separated into different species should more convincing empirical evidence be made available in future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".