MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912310245 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15837824

Ellescus californicus

2023· article· en· W6912310245 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicColeoptera Taxonomy and Distribution
Canadian institutionsCanadian Museum of Nature
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeWillowBequestType (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ellescus californicus (Casey, 1885), resurrected status Figs. 5C, 6C, 7 Elleschus californicus Casey, 1885 (original description). Elleschus ephippiatus var. californicus; O’ Brien and Wibmer 1982: 116 (catalogue, distribution). Elleschus ephippiatus; Poole and Gentili 1996: 215 (catalogue). Notes about the type series. This species was described from two specimens collected in California, United States of America. The holotype (USNM) is labelled with one brown rectangular label that reads “Cal.”, a second brown rectangular label that reads “californicus type. Casey.”, a third brown rectangular label that reads “CASEY bequest 1925”, a red rectangular label that reads “TYPE USNM 36721”, and an institutional ID label that reads “USNMENT 01448984”. Specimens examined Holotype. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: California: Casey (1, USNM), CASEY bequest 1925, TYPE USNM 36721, USNMENT 01448984. Other material. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: California: Sutter Co., Nicolaus, 18.iv.1971, Fred G. Andrews (1, CMNC); San Bernardino Co., Needles, 8.iv.1989, W.F. Barr, on willow (2, CMNC); San Bernardino Co., Victorville, 16.v.1955, W.R.M. Mason (1, CNCI); San Bernardino, F.C. Bowditch Collection (3, MCZC), MCZ-ENT00727018, MCZ-ENT00727020, MCZ-ENT00727022; Kern Co., Wofford Heights, 14–15.vii.1992, Henry and Anne Howden (4, CMNC); Greeley, W.G. Dietz Collection (4, MCZC), MCZ-ENT00727048 – MCZ-ENT00727051; Kern. Co., Alta Sierra, 15.vii.1992, Henry and Anne Howden (3, CMNC); Modoc Co., Cedarville, 1.iv.1946, W.F. Barr (1, CMNC); Los Angeles Co., Boquette, Boquet Canyon, 11.iv.1974, M.W. Hetz (1, UAIC); Sonoma Co., 2 mi. N of Cloverdale, 27.iii.1964, C.W. O’ Brien, on Salix (6, CNCI); Humboldt Co., Alton, 1.viii.1937, B.P. Bliven (6, CAS); Humboldt Co., Willow Creek, 13.vi.1916, F.E. Blaisdell (22, CAS); Humboldt Co., Myers, 22.ix.1935, B.P. Bliven (4, CAS); Oroville, 30.iv.1927 – 24.vi.1927, H.H. Keifer, on Salix hindsiana (2, CAS); Oroville, 21.iv. 1928, H.H. Keifer (1, CAS); Trinity Co., Carrville, 1.vi.1913, Van Dyke Collection (1, CAS); Monterey Co., Carmel, 5.viii.1917, L.S. Slevin Collection (1, CAS); Sacramento, 27.iii.1937, B.E. White (2, CAS); Ahwahnee, May (2, CAS; 1, MCZC), MCZ-ENT00727156; Castle Crag, vii, A. Fenyes (2, CAS); Kaweah, R. Hopping (1, CAS); Truckee, 7.vii.1927, E.P. Van Duzee (1, CAS); Calaveras Co., Mokell Hill, 11.vi.1921, F.E. Blaisdell (1, CAS); Napa Co., Butts Canyon, 13 km NW of Pope Valley, 17.iv.1982, T.W. Davies (21, CAS); Yosemite, 27.v.1931, B.E. White (1, CAS); Riverside, 5.iv.1990, H.C. Fall Collection and F. Blanchard Collection (8, MCZC), MCZ-ENT00727064 – MCZ-ENT00727067, MCZ-ENT00727145 – MCZ-ENT00727148; Ventura, 3.iv.1892, H.C. Fall Collection (1, MCZC), MCZ-ENT00727149; Lassen Co., 4.vi.1913, H.C. Fall Collection and C.A. Frost Collection (9, MCZC), MCZ-ENT00727076, MCZ-ENT00727077, MCZ-ENT00727150 – MCZ-ENT00727155; Plumas Co., 17.viii.1917, H.C. Fall Collection (2, MCZC), MCZ-ENT00727157, MCZ-ENT00727158; Castle Crags, vii, H.C. Fall Collection (1, MCZC), MCZ-ENT00727161; Visalia, Culbertson (1, MCZC), MCZ-ENT00727159; Lake Tahoe, 24.v.1879, W.G. Dietz Collection (1, MCZC), MCZ-ENT00727115; “Cal.”, Liebeck Collection (3, MCZC), MCZ-ENT00726986 – MCZ-ENT00726988; Oregon: Lake Co., 8 mi. W of Adel, 24.v.1973, K.J. Goeden (4, CMNC); Klamath Co., Sprague River canyon, 5 mi. E of Bly, 22.v.1958, Vertrees and Schuh, on Salix (1, CMNC). Diagnosis. Length 2.1–2.6 mm. Scales on pronotum usually not uniform in colour, with discoloured central and lateral bands. Metaventrite and metepisternum with scales relatively sparse not obscuring underlying cuticle. Distinct swelling at the tip of last ventrite of males (no longitudinal carina at middle of ventrite; often reduced or absent in smaller specimens). Apex of aedeagus quadrate to rounded, dorsoventrally flattened, and coming to a distinct, sharp point with two prominent tufts of setae. Aedeagus heavily sclerotised along lateral edges. Internal sac with protruding basal structures. Restricted to California and southern Oregon. Distribution in North America. This species is restricted to California and southern Oregon. The apparent lack of overlap in the ranges of E. californicus and E. ephippiatus is notable, and further sampling of both species in the region may reveal differences in host plant preferences. Remarks. This species occupies a region known for high rates of animal and plant endemism (Harrison 2013), including several endemic Salix and Populus species (Little 1979). Ellescus californicus has been collected from Salix exigua var. hindsiana (Bentham) Dorn, a plant endemic to southwest Oregon, California, and Baja California (Mexico) (Little 1979). Although this species was previously treated as a junior synonym of E. ephippiatus (O’ Brien and Wibmer 1982; Poole and Gentili 1996), the previously undocumented differences in male genitalia and lack of overlap in geographic range with E. ephippiatus support the status of E. californicus as a distinct species. Although molecular data were not secured for E. californicus due to a lack of recently collected specimens in examined museum collections, this species is clearly closely related to E. ephippiatus as it possesses (1) a prominent swelling at the tip of the last ventrite (males only), (2) discoloured (scales) pronotal bands, and (3) a pointed aedeagus and internal sac with protruding basal structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score0.218

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicColeoptera Taxonomy and DistributionFrench-language works237,207