Bibliographic record
Abstract
Polypedilum subgenus Cerobregma Saether et Sundal Polypedilum subgenus Cerobregma Saether et Sundal, 1999: 334. Chironomini genus C Pinder et Reiss, 1986: 362. Type species Polypedilum (Cerobregma) ontario (Walley) Chironomus ontario Walley, 1926: 206. Chironomus hirtipes Mitchell, 1908: 9 (preoccupied). Diagnostic characters. The male imagines can be separated from those of other subgenera by having extremely long and strong, split setae along inner margin of gonostylus and gonocoxite with apicolateral bulblike extension with deep lateral incision between bulb and gonostylus. The pupa is separable from that of other subgenera by the large cone-shaped cephalic tubercles, the large anal comb with numerous toothlets, the usual absence of anterior bands of stronger spinules on tergites and segments V and VI with all or some setae non-taeniate. The larva is distinguished by the triangularly shaped head, unusually small mouth-parts, indistinct striae on the approximately triangular ventromental plates and median teeth of mentum of about equal height.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".