MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6912335388 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3790372

Araripesuchus

2009· article· en· W6912335388 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSkullDorsumEnamel paintCretaceousBiting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Araripesuchus sp. Fig. 31 Material. MNN GAD 27; isolated left dentary lacking teeth. Type locality. Gadoufaoua, Agadez District, Niger Republic (more precise locality unknown) (Fig. 1A, C). Horizon. Elrhaz Formation, Tegama Series; Lower Cretaceous (Aptian-Albian), ca. 110 Mya (Taquet 1976). Discussion. With the notable exception of MNN GAD27, all of the cranial remains of Araripesuchus recovered from the Elrhaz Formation pertain to subadult or adult individuals with skull lengths between 10–15 cm. MNN GAD27, a left dentary lacking teeth with preserved crowns (Fig. 31), is approximately twice the length of the specimens described above for A. wegeneri and A. rattoides and would pertain to a skull approximately 25–30 cm long. In addition to its large size, the number of postcaniniform alveoli is greater than in other specimens. Probably at least three additional postcaniniform teeth are present. The largest teeth in the dentary of A. wegeneri are between alveoli 10 and 13. In this larger dentary, the postcaniniform alveoli increase in size markedly starting with alveolus 13, suggesting that the comparable range for the largest dentary teeth would be alveoli 13–16. Finally, the dorsal surface of dentary medial to the postcaniniform series (Fig. 31C) is flat, horizontal, and devoid of the accessory splenial articular scar observed in A. wegeneri (Fig. 18B) and A. rattoides (Fig. 27B). In medial view, for example, no part of the nonarticular symphyseal surface medial to the tooth row is exposed, in contrast to the other African species (Figs. 27B, 28C, 31B). The differences between this specimen and the others suggest the presence of a second, larger species of Araripesuchus in the Elrhaz Formation. A similar circumstance was recently proposed for fossil material recovered from the La Buitrera locality in the Candeleros Formation in Argentina (Pol and Apesteguia 2005). There, a second larger species similar in size to MNN GAD27 occurs as a contemporary of a more common smaller species of Araripesuchus (A. buitreraensis) with a skull length of under 15 cm. On the other hand, increased tooth number and better defined or developed features Figure 3|. Left dentary of the crocodyliform Araripesuchus sp. Cast (UCRC PVC7) of an isolated, edentulous left dentary (MNN GAD27). A Lateral view. B Medial view (reversed). C Dorsal view (reversed). Scale bar equals 1 cm. Abbreviations: ad3–5, 9, 13, 14, alveolus for dentary tooth 3–5, 9, 13, 14; asp, articular surface for the splenial; be, buccal emargination; dsym, dentary symphysis; fo, foramen; gr, groove; Mc, Meckel’s canal. may manifest themselves in particularly large individuals within a species. We are inclined to regard MNN GAD27 as a distinct species but await confirmation from more complete remains before establishing formal taxonomic recognition. Mahajangasuchidae fam. n. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 6C28D343-821D-4CF6-B293-F12EDBB59B15 Diagnosis. Mid- to large-sized (̴ 4–6 m) metasuchians with fused nasals, lacrimalnasal contact absent, postorbital bearing an oval laterally facing fossa that may have served for articulation with the posterior palpebral, squamosal and parietal form a hornlike posterodorsal process, steeply arched ventral jugal margin with a ventrolateral fossa at apex, ectopterygoid vertical and flush at jugal contact rather than arching medially, jaw articulation below posterior tooth row, pterygoid choanal septum with anterior footplate for palatine, pterygoid choanal septum with ventral edge expanded to approximately 40% of septum length, and pterygoid choanal wall invaginated dorsal to posterior margin of palate, deep mandibular symphysis oriented at approximately 45° anterodorsally, dorsolateral ridge on surangular, and maxillary tooth row terminates anterior to orbit. Etymology. Named on the basis of Mahajangasuchus insignis (Buckley and Brochu 1999), the first described member of the clade. New fossil finds continue to expand basal metasuchian diversity, although interrelationships are poorly established. Establishing this stem-based taxon for Mahajangasuchus, Kaprosuchus and taxa closer to them than to several other metasuchians establishes a well known anchor among basal metasuchians, to which other taxa may eventually be assigned. Phylogenetic definition. The most inclusive clade containing Mahajangasuchus insignis Buckley and Brochu 1999 but not Notosuchus terrestris Woodward 1896, Simosuchus clarki Buckley et al. 2000, Araripesuchus gomesii Price 1959, Baurusuchus pachecoi Price 1945, Peirosaurus torminni Price 1955, Goniopholis crassidens Owen 1842, Pholidosaurus schaumbergensis Meyer 1841, Crocodylus niloticus (Laurenti 1768). Discussion. Kaprosuchus saharicus represents a distinctive new crocodyliform distinguished by numerous cranial autapomorphies. Derived characters shared with other crocodyliforms are limited, although a suite of features listed in the familial diagnosis above links K. saharicus to the unusual crocodyliform, Mahajangasuchus insignis, from the Upper Cretaceous of Madagascar (Buckley and Brochu 1999; Turner and Buckley 2008). Th ese are described in more detail below (see Phylogenetic relationships).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationallow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Other
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Other designmedium
models splitAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.

The models disagree on parts of this classification; every voice is preserved in the section at the end of the page.

Study designObservational · Other design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical · Other

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils→French-language works237,207→