MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912336092 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3791057

Gyrophaena (Gyrophaena) lobata

2009· article· en· W6912336092 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Canadian institutionsCanadian Forest ServiceNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAedeagusApex (geometry)LobeDorsumSpermathecaSetaAppendageHead (geology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

VIII. Gyrophaena (Gyrophaena) lobata species group (Seevers 1951: 693) 11. Gyrophaena (Gyrophaena) lobata Casey Figs 10, 71–77; Map 7 Gyrophaena lobata Casey, 1906: 294; Seevers 1951: 693; Moore and Legner 1975: 430. Description. Body length 1.9–2.2 mm, narrowly oval and strongly glossy; head rufo-piceous to piceous; pronotum flavate with central part of disc piceous; elytra rufous with scutellar area and posterior angles piceous; abdomen rufo-flavate, apical part of abdomen sometimes darker. Punctation: vertex of head with several large umbilicate punctures on each side, pronotum with a few punctures, elytra finely punctate, in outer part of disc more densely so. Microsculpture: reticulate, distinct on head and weak to obsolete on pronotum and elytra. Antennae as illustrated (Fig. 10). Pronotum 1.3 times as wide as long. MALE: tergite 8 with two small lateral teeth and large median lobe (Fig. 73); sternite 8 broadly rounded apically (Fig. 74). Median lobe of aedeagus with approximately triangular tubus projecting ventrally, its venter strongly sinuate, apex narrow and acute (Fig. 71), dorsal projection of internal sac narrowly elongate and arcuate (Fig. 71). Paramere as illustrated (Fig. 72). FEMALE. Tergite 8 similar to that of male and with apical lobe (Fig. 76); sternite 8 broadly rounded and slightly pointed medially (Fig. 77); spermatheca as illustrated (Fig. 75). Bionomics. Macrohabitat: mixed and hardwood forests. Microhabitat: gilled mushrooms. Collecting period: July through September. Collecting method: sifting mushrooms and aspirating specimens. Distribution (Map 7). CANADA: New Brunswick; UNITED STATES: District of Columbia, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Michigan, New York, and Wisconsin. Map 7. Collection localities in New Brunswick, Canada of Gyrophaena lobata Ι3. G. antennalis Ι4. G. chippewa Ι5. G. insolens Figures Ι0–Ι5. Gyrophaena species in dorsal view (apical part of abdomen removed): Ι0 G. (G.) lobata Casey ΙΙ G. (G.) affinis Sahlberg Ι2 G. (G.) dybasi Seevers Ι3 G. (G.) antennalis Casey Ι4 G. (G.) chippewa Seevers and Ι5 G. (G.) insolens Casey.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.149 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomyFrench-language works237,207