Bibliographic record
Abstract
VIII. <i>Gyrophaena</i> (<i>Gyrophaena</i>) <i>lobata</i> species group (Seevers 1951: 693) 11. <i>Gyrophaena</i> (<i>Gyrophaena</i>) <i>lobata</i> Casey Figs 10, 71–77; Map 7 <i>Gyrophaena lobata</i> Casey, 1906: 294; Seevers 1951: 693; Moore and Legner 1975: 430. <b>Description.</b> Body length 1.9–2.2 mm, narrowly oval and strongly glossy; head rufo-piceous to piceous; pronotum flavate with central part of disc piceous; elytra rufous with scutellar area and posterior angles piceous; abdomen rufo-flavate, apical part of abdomen sometimes darker. Punctation: vertex of head with several large umbilicate punctures on each side, pronotum with a few punctures, elytra finely punctate, in outer part of disc more densely so. Microsculpture: reticulate, distinct on head and weak to obsolete on pronotum and elytra. Antennae as illustrated (Fig. 10). Pronotum 1.3 times as wide as long. MALE: tergite 8 with two small lateral teeth and large median lobe (Fig. 73); sternite 8 broadly rounded apically (Fig. 74). Median lobe of aedeagus with approximately triangular tubus projecting ventrally, its venter strongly sinuate, apex narrow and acute (Fig. 71), dorsal projection of internal sac narrowly elongate and arcuate (Fig. 71). Paramere as illustrated (Fig. 72). FEMALE. Tergite 8 similar to that of male and with apical lobe (Fig. 76); sternite 8 broadly rounded and slightly pointed medially (Fig. 77); spermatheca as illustrated (Fig. 75). <b>Bionomics. Macrohabitat:</b> mixed and hardwood forests. <b>Microhabitat:</b> gilled mushrooms. <b>Collecting period:</b> July through September. <b>Collecting method:</b> sifting mushrooms and aspirating specimens. <b>Distribution</b> (Map 7). <b>CANADA: New Brunswick</b>; UNITED STATES: District of Columbia, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Michigan, New York, and Wisconsin. <b>Map 7.</b> Collection localities in New Brunswick, Canada of <i>Gyrophaena lobata</i> <b>Ι3. <i>G. antennalis</i> Ι4. <i>G. chippewa</i> Ι5. <i>G. insolens</i></b> <b>Figures Ι0–Ι5.</b> <i>Gyrophaena</i> species in dorsal view (apical part of abdomen removed): <b>Ι0</b> <i>G</i>. (<i>G</i>.) <i>lobata</i> Casey <b>ΙΙ</b> <i>G</i>. (<i>G</i>.) <i>affinis</i> Sahlberg <b>Ι2</b> <i>G</i>. (<i>G</i>.) <i>dybasi</i> Seevers <b>Ι3</b> <i>G</i>. (<i>G</i>.) <i>antennalis</i> Casey <b>Ι4</b> <i>G</i>. (<i>G</i>.) <i>chippewa</i> Seevers and <b>Ι5</b> <i>G</i>. (<i>G</i>.) <i>insolens</i> Casey.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.078 | 0.035 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".