MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912342497 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4579774

Kokkocynips imbricariae Nieves-Aldrey & Nicholls & Tang & Melika & Stone & Pujade-Villar & Buffington & Maldonado & Medianero 2021, n. comb.

2021· article· en· W6912342497 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMollusks and Parasites Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsType (biology)SpellingGallTaxonomy (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kokkocynips imbricariae (Ashmead, 1896) n. comb. (Figs. 6, 10F, 11B) Andricus imbrecariae Ashmead, 1896. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., vol. 19, p.122. Holcaspis fasciata Bassett, 1900. Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc., vol, 26, p.328. [Syn. by Weld, 1926b: 43]. Dryocosmus fasciatus (Bassett): Weld, 1922a. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., vol. 61, art. 18, p.7. Dryocosmus imbricariae* (Ashmead): Weld, 1926b. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., 68, 43. * The original spelling ‘imbrecariae’ is a typographical error and Ashmead had corrected it in his own copy of the paper to align it with the name of the host oak (Weld, 1926b). Material examined: syntypes. Andricus imbrecariae. Through CV Riley, No. 714 P on Q. imbricariae, St. L. Mo., Oct 12. 81, Type number 3072, USNM, Andricus imbrecariae, USNMENT 00802135 (USNM). Missouri. No. 714 P on Q. imbracariae, St. Louis, MO. 12 Oct 1881, CV Riley, USNM type # 3072. Two females. USNMENT01735157 and USNMENT01735158 (USNM). Cotypes. Disholcaspis fasciata. Connecticut. Waterbury, HF Bassett, cotype, USNM type # 27177, Holcaspis fasciata WB Bassett. 17 females. USNMENT01735140-USNMENT01735156 (USNM). Other material examined: USA. Alabama and Florida. Hopkins 15632a. Troy and Dothan, AL; Cottondate, FL. Quercus marilandica and Quercus falcata, October 1919., LH Weld. 10 females. USNMENT01735100-US-NMENT01735109 (USNM). Missouri. Hopkins 10776a. Iorton, Quercus rubra. 12 Oct. 1918. Galls collected on ground, some from twigs; wasps emerged Oct. 1919. 5 females, USNMENT10735116-USNMENT01735120 (USNM). Poplar Bluff, IX.20.1918, LH Weld, ex Q. digitata, Beutt coll. record 1935, 1 female, USNMENT01735159 (USNM). St. Louis, MO., No. 136 on Q. imbracariae, CV Riley, 2 females, USNMENT01735171 and USN-MENT01735172 (USNM). Texas. Hunter 2701, Victoria, ex black jack spkld., X.29.1910; emerged II.1.1912. 11 females. USNMENT01735123, USNMENT01735125-USNMENT01735134 (USNM). Hunter 1369, Victoria, bd stem gall oak, X,17.1905, JD Mitchell, coll. 7 females. USNMENT01735122, USNMENT01735124, USN-MENT01735135-USNMENT01735139 (USNM). Victoria Co., Colleto Creek. 29 Oct. 1905, JD Mitchell, Coll. Issued 20 Nov 1906. 10 females, USNMENT01735160-USNMENT01735169 (USNM). Virginia. Hopkins 10773q. East Falls Church. 3 Oct 1018. Galls collected by Penelope Brown just before falling. Cynipini emerged/mounted Oct. 1919. 5 females. USNMENT01735110-USNMENT01735114 (USNM). Unknown locality. ‘714P’ Sept. 10, 1909, 2 females, USNMENT01735173 and USNMENT01735174 (USNM). Gall: according to the original description (Ashmead 1896) the gall is globular, brownish and hard, 7-10 mm in diameter (Fig. 11B). The surface of the gall has a striped pattern, and is hence commonly known as the banded bullet gall. The galls typically grow in clusters from a fissure in twigs from the previous year’s growth. The larval cell is nearly always closely cemented to the thick, hard, gall epidermis, but in a single instance there were a few fibers separating it. Host plant: the species was described from galls collected on Quercus imbricaria and Q. ilicifolia. Weld (1926b) added Quercus marilandica, Q. catesbaei, Q. texana and Q. laurifolia to the host plant records, and later mentioned that it galled all eastern US red oak species (Weld 1959). Biology: known only from an asexual generation. Adults emerge from galls from September to October. Galls collected in the autumn produced adults in the following year, but some emerged a year later after diapause (Ashmead 1896). Distribution: USA and Canada; originally described from Missouri, and also recorded from many localities from Ontario southwards to Florida and westwards to Texas (Weld 1926b). Remarks: this species shares the main diagnostic characters that define Kokkocynips as described herein, although it is readily distinguished from the type species and other Kokkocynips species by the characters given in the identification key. Moreover, our phylogenetic analyses also support transfer of this species to Kokkocynips, placing it sister to the type species (a placement reflected in the very similar gall morphology) and also closely allied to K. difficilis and K. decidua.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.656
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicMollusks and Parasites StudiesFrench-language works237,207