Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genus Pusiodactylus new genus Type species Pusiodactylus mondacai Smith, here designated. Description (Figs. 18-19). Length 4.6-7.8 mm. Dorsal surface bicolored with even setal pattern. Head: mentum approximately 4x longer than wide, with weak longitudinal trough in P. mondacai. Pronotum: widest medially, width approximately equal to length. Legs: protibia with two apical teeth on outer margin, without series of small teeth medially and basally. Claws symmetrical, each side split apically. Protibial spurs absent. Metatibial spurs absent in males, females have 1-2 metatibial spurs (1 in P. flavipennis and 2 in P. mondacai). Etymology. Pusiodactylus is formed to indicate the similarity of this genus to species in the genus Macrodactylus. “ Pusio ” is Latin for “a small boy” in reference to the very small size of the two species in this genus relative to other melolonthine species. The name is masculine in gender. Remark. Until now, this genus erroneously went under the name Pristerophora Harold. This was based on a long-standing misidentification of the type species of Pristerophora. Now that this nomenclatural problem has been corrected (see under Pristerophora), it is necessary to create a new generic name for this taxon.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".