Rudolfina tumida Paiero & Marshall 2020, sp. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rudolfina tumida sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 1FA40DBE-98EE-4665-A029-207ABCADE8DD Figs 2–3, 21A Etymology The species epithet is from the Latin for ‘swollen’, referring to the enlarged epandrium. Material examined Holotype UNITED STATES OF AMERICA • ♂; Wyoming, Uinta Co., 8 mi. SE of Evanston; 7100 ft a.s.l.; 30 Jul.–11 Aug. 1979; S. and J. Peck leg.; sage-grass, riparian, carrion; DEBU debu01086083. Description BODY. Length: 1.8–1.9 mm. Eye height 1.0 × genal height. Head with 3 interfrontal setae and 5 small setae along inner margin of orbital plate. Gena with 2 strong setae and 4–5 smaller setulae. Acrostichal setulae in 4–6 rows. Costagial seta length unknown (broken on both sides of holotype); second costal sector shorter than third (35:40). Length of M 1 between crossveins dm-cu and r-m 4.0× dm-cu; CuA 1 stub vein ~5.0 × M 1 stub vein. Male mid femur basally with 9 strong setae present in ovoid cluster. Male mid tibia with ventral comb of 12–13 robust setae on apical ⅔. MALE ABDOMEN (Figs 2–3). Posterior margin of sternite 5 with pair of small teeth on each side of shallow emargination; emargination extending ¼ length and ¼ width of sternite 5. Transverse part of sternite 6 weakly arcuate. Epandrium swollen, wider than preceding portion of abdomen (denuded on holotype); subanal plate incomplete. Posterior lobe of surstylus elongate, with apex and posterior margin heavily setose; anterobasal lobe broadly rounded and laminate, with distal triangular projection. Cercus ovoid. Postgonite elongate with apex acute. Dorsal sclerite of distiphallus (Fig. 21 B–C) with several small swellings along length and extending beyond apex of acrophallus. Female Unknown. Remarks Rudolfina tumida sp. nov. is distinctive for the uniquely swollen epandrium and large surstylus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".