MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6912370072 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5334127

Macrostomus furcatus Rafael & Cumming, 2009, n. sp.

2009· article· en· W6912370072 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicParasite Biology and Host Interactions
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaDorsumTibiaSternumAnterior surfaceApex (geometry)Holotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Macrostomus furcatus, n. sp. (Figs. 5a–j, 9) Diagnosis. Thorax, abdomen and legs predominantly yellow; postcranium black with gray pruinescence; male tergite 8 with blunt distal forked projection. Female hind tibia with pinnate scales along most of dorsal surface and ventral basal third. Description. Holotype male. Frons approximately half anterior ocellus width. Face slightly wider than frons only at ventral margin. Postcranium black. Antenna black with pedicel yellowish. Palpus yellow. Thorax shining yellow with yellow to gray-brown pruinescence. Setae: 4 dorsocentrals; 1 supra-alar presutural; 2 pairs of scutellars; 3-5 antepronotals; 1–3 tiny proepisternals; 3–5 katatergitals. Legs shining yellow with apex of mid and hind femora, apex of hind tibia and all tarsi black, except fore and mid tarsomere 1 mostly yellow and fore tarsomeres 1–3 white distally. Mid tibia with two slightly stout dorsal setae at median third; hind tibia with 4–5 slender dorsal setae; first hind tarsomere with three longer dorsal setae. Wing with costal and apical margin brown infuscated (Fig. 5a). Halter dark yellow to brown. Abdomen shining yellow with black terminalia. Tergite 8 (Fig. 5b) with blunt bifid distal projection. Epandrium with anterodorsal and posterodorsal protuberances of subequal length (Fig. 5c). Anterior cercus somewhat elongate; posterior cercus rounded distally, with a few anterodorsal setae and two internal protuberances, one longer and apparently bifid anteriorly and other small and simple posteriorly (Figs. 5d–e). Hypandrium (Fig. 5f) with a few setae medially and paired serrated protuberances distally. Size. Body length 3.1 mm; wing length 3.2 mm. Female. Frons slightly wider than anterior ocellus width; face narrower than frons, approximately one third anterior ocellus width. First hind tarsomere with one longer dorsal seta; hind tibia with pinnate scales on most of dorsal surface and ventrally on basal third. Wing wider than in male, more brown infuscated (Fig. 5g). Terminalia black sparsely gray pruinose. Tergite 8 and sternite 8 as in Figs. 5h–i. Genital fork as in Fig. 5j. Internal egg oval. Size. Body length 3.2 mm; wing length 3.3 mm. Geographical records. Brazil (Amazonas, Acre states), Fig. 9. Material. Holotype ♂: BRASIL, Amazonas, Pq [Parque] Nac [ional] [do] Jau, Seringal, 27.iv–03.v.1995 / / arm[adilha] Malaise, J.A. Rafael & J.[F.] Vidal (INPA). Paratypes: same data as holotype (1♀ INPA); Pq. Nac. Jau, Rio Jau, Seringalzinho, 015028S–613523W, 01.viii.1995, varredura, J.A. Rafael & J. Vidal (1♂ INPA, in glycerin); Igarapé Miratucu, Ig. do Gerlei, 015700S–614900W, 23–28.vii.1985, arm. Malaise, J.A. Rafael & J.Vidal (1♀ INPA, in glycerin); S. Izabel do R. Negro, Maturacá, 11–13.x.1990, arm. Malaise, J.A. Rafael (1♂ CNC); Acre, Cruzeiro do Sul, Rio Moa, 073702S–724615W, 15–28.xi.1996, varredura, mata, J.A. Rafael, J. Vidal & R. L. Menezes (1♂ CNC). Holotype condition. Good, not dissected. Etymology. From Latin furca = fork, in reference to the furcated projection of male tergite 8. Discussion. Macrostomus furcatus differs from all other species of the M. ferrugineus species-group by tergite 8 ending in a blunt bifid distal projection, by the shape of the posterior lobe of the cercus, and by the serrated apex of the hypandrium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicParasite Biology and Host Interactions→French-language works237,207→