Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lasionycta luteola species-group The L. luteola species-group contains only L. luteola (Smith), a small (forewing length 12–14 mm) alpine species occurring in northwestern North America. It is characterized by the male and female genitalia. Males have an ovate flattened uncus, a strap-like valve with a relatively small cucullus, a straight digitus, and a vesica with a 360° subbasal coil with stout crenulate basal cornuti. Females have a soft pad-like ovipositor covered with long hairs, a relatively long ductus bursae (0.9× corpus bursae), and a strongly constricted bursa copulatrix with slightly smaller appendix bursae than corpus bursae. Th e male antenna is biserrate, approximately 1.8× as wide as the shaft. The L. luteola species-group is structurally intermediate between the L. mutilata and L. leucocycla species-groups. Th e male uncus and basal vesica cornuti resemble those of the L. mutilata species-group whereas the valve and vesica shapes are more like those of the L. leucocycla species-group. In the female, the pad-like ovipositor is similar to that of the L. mutilata species-group but the cylindrical ductus bursae and smaller corpus bursae are like those of the L. leucocycla species-group. The L. luteola species-group CO1 sequence differs from those of all other Lasionycta species by more than 2.9 %. Lasionycta luteola is always an isolated species on distance analysis, most often placed near the L. mutilata species-group (Fig. 247).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".