MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6912387466 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3790949

Aleochara (Xenochara) lanuginosa Gravenhorst 1802

2009· article· en· W6912387466 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources CanadaCanadian Forest Service
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLine drawingsAdult maleTaxonomy (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aleochara (Xenochara) lanuginosa Gravenhorst, 1802 Fig 6, Map 6 New Records. New Brunswick, Northumberland Co., Burnt Church near Burnt Church River, 47.2075°N, 65.1471°W, 7.VIII.2005 (3 Ƌ, 2 sex undetermined, NBM, RWC). York Co., Charters Settlement, 45.8395°N, 66.7391°W, 14.V.2005 (1 ♀, RWC). Bionomic Notes. This species was collected from cow dung, and compost (decaying vegetables). Adults were collected in May and August. Collection method: sifting. Distribution in Canada and Alaska. BC, AB, ON, QC, NB, NF (Klimaszewski 1984; Gouix and Klimaszewski 2007). Tribe Hoplandriini Fenyes, 1920 Hoplandria (s. str.) lateralis (Melsheimer, 1844) Fig 7, Map 7 New Records. CANADA, New Brunswick, Queens Co., Grand Lake near Youngs Cove, 45.9636°N, 65.9979°W, 4.VIII.2005 (1 ♁, RWC). Bionomic Notes. This species was collected from under a cobblestone along a lake margin with a cobblestone beach. Collection method: hand collecting (turning over cobblestones). Map 6. Collection localities in New Brunswick, Canada of Aleochara lanuginosa. Map 7. Collection localities in New Brunswick, Canada of Hoplandria lateralis. Distribution in Canada and Alaska. ON, QC, NB (Génier 1989; Hanley 2003; Gouix and Klimaszewski 2007). Tribe Oxypodini Thomson, 1859 Amarochara formicina Assing, 2007 Figs 8, 58–60, Map 8 Additional Records. CANADA, New Brunswick, York Co., Charters Settlement, 45.8446°N, 66.7262°W, 4.VI.2005 (2 ♁, 1 ♀, RWC); Charters Settlement, 45.8286°N, 66.7365°W, 23.V.2005, 3.V.2006, 15.IX.2006 (2 ♁, 4 sex undetermined, RWC); 14 km W of Tracy off Rt. 645, 45.6862°N, 66.8651°W, 9.V.2007 (1 ♁, NBM). Bionomic Notes. Adults were collected from the nests of a black Formica species of mound building ant. Some adults were collected by sifting soil from the top layer of the nest, including the holotype and paratypes (Assing 2007). However, the most efficient method for collecting adults of this species was to place small boards on the ant nests and examine the underside of the boards on subsequent days. Adults would be found resting on the underside of the boards. Adults were collected during April, May and September. Th is species probably overwinters in the adult stage. Collection method: sifting top layer of a nest, examining underside of boards placed on a nest. Map 8. Collection localities in New Brunswick, Canada of Amarochara formicina. Į0 ĮĮ Į2 Figures 7–Į2. 7 Hoplandria lateralis 8 Amarochara formicina 9 A. inquilina Į0 Calodera parviceps ĮĮ Crataraea suturalis Į2 Devia prospera [8, 11, apical part of abdomen removed]. Scale = 1 mm Distribution in Canada and Alaska. NB (Assing 2007). Additional specimens were collected from ants at other sites near the type locality and near Tracy, New Brunswick. Th is species may be more widespread than the records indicate. Comments. The female of A. formicina was unknown at the time of the description (Assing 2007) and the female spermatheca, tergite and sternite 8 are illustrated for the first time in Figures 58–60. Externally the female is identical to the male. The spermatheca of A. formicina is similar in shape to that of A. inquilina, but is significantly larger.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.133

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics→French-language works237,207→