Macrocamptoptera metotarsa Giraulti 1905
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Macrocamptoptera metotarsa Giraultı 1905 (Figure 4) Camptoptera metotarsa Girault 1905: 91. Type locality: Arlington, Arlington Co., Virginia, USA. Holotype female [USNM], examined (Triapitsyn 2012). Macrocamptoptera metotarsa (Girault) (in part, specimens from North America only): Triapitsyn 2012: 97 (key), 100 – 104 (taxonomic history, type information, redescription of female, description of male, diagnosis, illustrations, distribution). Material examined Canada, Ontario, Rondeau Provincial Park, 16.viii – 18.ix.1979 [1 female, NHMUK]. USA: North Carolina, Scotland County, Sandhills Game Lands, 36°12 ʹ 03 ” N 78°53 ʹ 13 ” W, 125 m, 5 – 19.iv.2010, R. L. Blinn [1 female, CNC]. Ohio, Franklin County, Columbus, Kinnear Rd., 23 – 30.ix.2003, N. F. Johnson [1 female, UCRC (UCRC_ENT 00436769, D6046, Figure 4 (a))]. Diagnosis Female of this Nearctic species is characterised by its slender, bi-coloured antennal scape, which is mostly yellow or light brown, except apically brown or dark brown (Figure 4 (a,b)). See Triapitsyn (2012) for illustrated redescription and diagnosis (they were based on North American specimens of the true M. metotarsa only, even though at that time the species was erroneously considered to have a Holarctic distribution, but out of precaution the European specimens were not included in the redescription). Distribution Nearctic Region: Canada (Alberta, Ontario, Quebec) and USA (Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio [new record], South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia) (Triapitsyn 2012).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".