Phytomyza solidaginivora Spencer in Doellingeria 1969
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phytomyza solidaginivora Spencer (Figs. 205, 360–365) Material examined. MAINE: Washington Co., Perry, Sipp Bay—Old County Rd., 19.vi.2013, em. 3–5.vii.2013, C.S. Eiseman, ex Doellingeria umbellata, #CSE650, CNC358493, CNC358494 (2♂). Host. Asteraceae: * Doellingeria umbellata (Mill.) Nees; Spencer’s (1969) record of Solidago requires confirmation (see Comments). Leaf mine. (Fig. 205) Whitish, upper surface, narrow, entirely linear; frass in closely spaced grains or beaded strips along the sides. Puparium. Formed outside the mine. Distribution. * USA: ME; Canada: AB. Comments. This species was described from a single specimen Spencer (1969) reared from a plant he identified as a Solidago sp. Griffiths (1976) could not reconcile the preserved leaf with either of the goldenrods common near the type locality (Edmonton, AB) and suggested that the host plant might actually be Canadanthus modestus (Lindl.) G.L. Nesom; however, he was unable to find Phytomyza mines on that host. The leaf in Spencer’s illustration looks very much like Doellingeria umbellata, the host from which we reared this species. Both specimens are teneral, having died without expanding their wings. The genitalia (Figs. 360–365) differ slightly from those of the holotype in that the hypophallus does not end in a point, but is broadly squared apically with two corners.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".