Bibliographic record
Abstract
Madoniella dislocata (Say, 1825) NOVA SCOTIA: 54 specimens examined from Antigonish, Cape Breton, Halifax, Kings, Pictou, and Queens counties. The earliest record is from 1962 (Kings Co.: Berwick, 28.viii.1962, H.T. Stultz, ACNS). PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND: Queens Co.: St. Patricks, 14.vii.2002, C.G. Majka, red spruce forest, CGMC. Newly recorded in Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island. Scattered records from across the region (Figure 7) [Specimens of M. dislocata from NB were not available for examination; consequently they are not plotted on the distribution map.]. In Point Pleasant Park, Nova Scotia, found in association with the galleries of Scolytinae feeding on red spruce (Picea rubens) and white pine (Pinus strobus). The most abundant scolytines found in these galleries (75% of individuals) are Hylurgops rugipennis pinifex, Trypodendron lineatum, and Polygraphus rufipennis in spruce, and Ips pini, and Pityogenes hopkinsi in pine (C. Majka, unpublished data). Associated with bark beetles in oak (Quercus), juniper (Juniperus), cedar (Thuja) (Cupressaceae), hickory (Carya), pine (Pinus), hackberry (Celtis occidentalis L.) (Ulmaceae), black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill.) BSP.), butternut (Juglans cinerea L.) (Juglandaceae), redbud (Cercis) (Brassicaceae), and other hardwoods (Opitz 2002). Knull (1951) reported it as predaceous on Anelaphus villosus (Fabricius) (Cerambycidae), Bitoma carinata (LeConte) (Colydiidae), Chramesus hicoriae LeConte (Curculionidae), Hylocurus sp., Scolytus muticus Say, S. rugulosus Ratz., Pityophthorus dentifrons Blackman, P. consimilis LeConte, and Polygraphus rufipennis (Kirby) (all Scolytinae).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".