Bibliographic record
Abstract
Key to species of <i>Schistoglossa</i> occurring in Canada 1 Antennal articles 6–10 slightly to strongly transverse (Figs 1–5)................. <b>2</b> – Antennal articles 6–10 slightly to strongly elongate (Figs 6–8).................... <b>6</b> 2 Elytra short and strongly transverse (Figs 3–5)........................................... <b>3</b> – Elytra slightly elongate (Figs 1–2).............................................................. <b>5</b> 3 Eyes streamlined and not protruding from contour of head, postocular area about three times maximum diameter of eye (Fig. 5); male tergite 8 slightly emarginate apically and slightly crenulate (Fig. 47); apex of median lobe of aedeagus slightly produced ventrally (Figs 45, 46); spermatheca S-shaped (Fig. 49)........................................... <b> <i>S. hampshirensis</i> Klimaszewski, sp. n.</b> – Eyes slightly protruding from contour of head, postocular area from two to two and a half times maximum diameter of an eye (Figs 3, 4).................... <b>4</b> 4 Body length 1.8–2.1 mm; male tergite 8 with strongly concave apical margin and irregularly crenulate (Fig. 37); apex of median lobe of aedeagus strongly produced ventrally (Fig. 35); spermatheca S-shaped (Fig. 39)........................................................... <b> <i>S. brunswickensis</i> Klimaszewski & Webster, sp. n.</b> – Body length 2.7–2.9 mm; male tergite 8 with slightly concave apical margin and regularly crenulated (Fig. 28); apex of median lobe of aedeagus slightly produced ventrally (Fig. 27); spermatheca L-shaped (Fig. 30)......................................................... <b> <i>S. pseudocampbelli</i> Klimaszewski & Webster, sp. n.</b> 5 Maximum width of pronotum distinctly less than width of elytra at shoulders (Fig.1); elytral ratio of maximum length to maximum width 0.7 (Fig. 1); apical margin of tergite 8 with two larger lateral teeth and lacking regular crenulation (Fig. 12); spermatheca L-shaped (Fig. 14)..... <b> <i>S. charlottae</i> Klimaszewski, sp. n.</b> – Maximum width of pronotum about the same as width of elytra at shoulders (Fig. 2); elytral ratio of maximum length to maximum width 0.8 (Fig. 2); apical margin of male tergite 8 with two larger lateral teeth and regular crenulation (Fig. 20); spermatheca S-shaped (Fig. 22)............. <b> <i>S. campbellii</i> Klimaszewski sp. n.</b> 6 Body length 2.8–3.0 mm, elytra broadening posteriorly (Fig. 7); median lobe of aedeagus and spermatheca as illustrated (Figs 61, 62, 65)........................................................................................ <b> <i>S. carexiana</i> Klimaszewski, sp. n.</b> – Body length 2.3–2.5 mm, elytra subparallel (Figs 6, 8).............................. <b>7</b> 7 Elytra as long as pronotum at suture (Fig. 6); postocular area approximately as long as three times maximum diameter of eye seen from above (Fig. 6); median lobe of aedeagus with slightly sinuate venter of tubus and narrowly elongate apex (Fig. 54); spermatheca with capsule lacking invagination (Fig. 57).................................... <b> <i>S. sphagnorum</i> Klimaszewski & Webster, sp. n.</b> – Elytra longer than pronotum at suture (Fig. 8); postocular area approximately as long as two times maximum diameter of eye seen from above (Fig. 8); median lobe of aedeagus with strongly sinuate venter of tubus and short and blunt apex (Fig. 70); spermatheca with capsule bearing large invagination (Fig. 73)....................................... <b> <i>S. blatchleyi</i> (Bernhauer & Scheerpeltz)</b>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".