Bibliographic record
Abstract
90. Brachyiulus pusillus (Leach, 1814) Iulus pusillus Leach, 1814. Brachyiulus littoralis Verhoeff, 1898. Distribution AL, AT, BA, BE, CH, DE, DK-DEN, EE, ES-CNY, ES-SPA, FR-FRA, GB-CI, GB-GRB, GB-NI, GR- GRC, HR, IE, IT-ITA, LT, LU, MC, MN, NL, PL, PT-AZO, PT-MDR, RU-KGD, SE. – Introduced into Tunisia, South Africa, Australia and North America, Habitat Often in damp areas near watercourses, meadows, marshes, marshy woodland and farmland. On afforested colliery spoil heaps with garden refuse (Decker & Hannig 2010). In Western Europe it is not usually common in woodland, much more associated with arable land and pastures. It is reputed to favour heavy soils and is probably able to withstand inundation (Jeekel & Brugge 2001). Numbers may be found in damp buildings. In the north of its range it is synanthropic. Remarks Brachyiulus pusillus adults are visible throughout the year, by far most frequently in the spring when they breed. The species has been widely dispersed by human activity, occurring in Australasia, South Africa, North and South America and on many of the Atlantic Islands (Blower 1985; Lee 2006). The Greek specimens from the Ionian area were named as the variety ionica by Strasser (1974).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".