Bibliographic record
Abstract
Key to the Diglotta species recorded from the Nearctic region The following key was modified from Haghebaert (1991). Elytral length was measured from the humeral angle to the hind margin; body length was measured from the apical margin of the labrum to the apex of the abdomen. Th e body length is given without range for species known only from a holotype (D. littoralis), or where such data was not available from the literature. For descriptions and genital illustrations of D. legneri, D. littoralis and D. pacifica see Haghebaert (1991). 1. Metatarsus with 4 articles (tarsal formula 4-4-4); elytra at least as long as pronotum; Atlantic coast of Canada............. D. mersa (Haliday) [Figs. 1-11] – Metatarsus with 5 articles (tarsal formula 4-4-5); elytra shorter than pronotum; Atlantic or Pacific coast of North America..........................................2 2. Body brownish, length 2.6 mm; antennae elongate; Pacific coast................................................................................................ D. legneri Moore & Orth – Body brown to light testaceous, length less than 2.0 mm; antennae short; Atlantic or Pacific coast............................................................................... 3 3. Head slightly broader than long; punctation finely asperate; colour light testaceous; body length 1.8 mm; Atlantic coast................ D. littoralis (Horn) – Head one third broader than long, punctation coarse and dense; colour brownish; body length 1.5 mm; Pacific coast..................... D. pacifica Fenyes
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.082 | 0.025 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".