Camptopteroides (Camptopteroides) armata Viggiani 1974
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Camptopteroides (Camptopteroides) armata Viggiani, 1974 (Figs 26–30) Camptopteroides armata Viggiani, 1974: 4–6. Type locality: at 1400 m in a forested mountain E of Hatton (Nuwara Eliya District of Central Province), Sri Lanka. Camptopteroides armata Viggiani: Viggiani, 1989: 147 (illustration of male genitalia). Camptopteroides (Camptopteroides) armata Viggiani: Huber & Lin, 1999: 32. Diagnosis. MALE. Body dark brown; fore wing with uneven brown tinge. Antenna (Fig. 28) slender; scape with faint sculpture; flagellum 10-segmented, with fl 2 very short, ring-like, and all segments without mps but with setae. Mesoscutum with reticulate sculpture (Fig. 29). Fore wing (Fig. 30) with moderately pointed apex, 9.1× as long as wide, longest marginal seta about 3.3× maximum wing width. Digitus of genitalia with two spines. Type material. Holotype male (MHNG) on slide (Fig. 26) labeled: 1. “ Ceylon Hatton, 9.11.1970 1400 m. Montagne boisée à l’est de la ville. Tamisage au forêt”; 2. “ Camptopteroides armata n. gen. n. sp. Olotipe [sic] ♂ det. G. VIGGIANI 1974 coll. BESUCHET-LÖBL”; 3. “Prép. micr. MHNG No ENTO 84605”. Distribution. Sri Lanka. Remarks. This species is known from a single specimen, the holotype male, collected by the coleopterists C. Besuchet and I. Löbl by sifting in forest (almost certainly of soil and leaf litter and then extracting specimens using Winkler funnels). The holotype is poorly mounted in a darkened, water-soluble Faure medium. Only its digital images were examined (Figs 27–30).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".