Bolitochara marginella Casey 1893
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bolitochara marginella Casey 1893:370 Silusida marginella; Casey 1906:271 Sableta (Canastota) canadensis Casey 1910:108, syn. nov. (other references omitted) Lectotype of Sableta (Canastota) canadensis Casey 1910 (here designated), #, with labels as follows: ‘‘Toronto, Ont., R. J. Crew’’, ‘‘ Canastota canadensis Csy. ’’, ‘‘CASEY bequest 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM 39135’’ (red label), ‘‘ LECTOTYPE, Sableta (Canastota) canadensis Casey 1910, Designated: J.S. Ashe and V. Gusarov, 2001’’. Lectotype is designated to assure correct and consistent application of the name in the future. Lectotype of B. marginella Casey 1893 (here designated), #, with labels as follows: ‘‘N.Y.’’, ‘‘#’’, ‘‘CASEY bequest 1925’’, ‘‘ marginella -2 PARATYPE USNM 39509’’ (red label), ‘‘ LECTOTYPE, Bolitochara marginella Casey 1893, Designated: J.S. Ashe and V. I. Gusarov, 2001.’’ Paralectotypes of B. marginella, 3#, 8$, 1 specimen (sex undetermined), same locality label as the lectotype. Lectotype is designated to assure correct and consistent application of the name in the future. The lectotype of S. canadensis is conspecific with the lectotype and paralectotypes of B. marginella and agrees with the accepted concept of the species (e.g., Ashe 1992).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".