Bolitochara marginella Casey 1893
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bolitochara marginella Casey 1893:370 Silusida marginella; Casey 1906:271 Sableta (Canastota) canadensis Casey 1910:108, syn. nov. (other references omitted) Lectotype of Sableta (Canastota) canadensis Casey 1910 (here designated), #, with labels as follows: ‘‘Toronto, Ont., R. J. Crew’’, ‘‘ Canastota canadensis Csy. ’’, ‘‘CASEY bequest 1925’’, ‘‘TYPE USNM 39135’’ (red label), ‘‘ LECTOTYPE, Sableta (Canastota) canadensis Casey 1910, Designated: J.S. Ashe and V. Gusarov, 2001’’. Lectotype is designated to assure correct and consistent application of the name in the future. Lectotype of B. marginella Casey 1893 (here designated), #, with labels as follows: ‘‘N.Y.’’, ‘‘#’’, ‘‘CASEY bequest 1925’’, ‘‘ marginella -2 PARATYPE USNM 39509’’ (red label), ‘‘ LECTOTYPE, Bolitochara marginella Casey 1893, Designated: J.S. Ashe and V. I. Gusarov, 2001.’’ Paralectotypes of B. marginella, 3#, 8$, 1 specimen (sex undetermined), same locality label as the lectotype. Lectotype is designated to assure correct and consistent application of the name in the future. The lectotype of S. canadensis is conspecific with the lectotype and paralectotypes of B. marginella and agrees with the accepted concept of the species (e.g., Ashe 1992).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".