MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912526499 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3590121

Saner 2020: Cross-Dataset Design Discussion Mining: Replication Package

2020· article· en· W6912526499 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Graph Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPython (programming language)DownloadR packageDirectoryReplication (statistics)JavaScriptPackage designRoot (linguistics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Saner 2020 Replication package for Cross-Dataset Design Discussion Mining Environment ubuntu==16.04 python==3.6.9 pip==18.1 Getting Started Please go to the root directory of the project. Run pip install -r requirements.txt For datasets, please go here. Download files.zip and extract it into the project root directory. python Get in Touch Alvi Mahadi: alvi.utsab@gmail.com Karan Tongay: karantongay@gmail.com Neil Ernst: neil@neilernst.net

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.028
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.105
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Reproducibility · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.972
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0280.105
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.004
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3100.213

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
DomainReproducibility
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicAdvanced Graph Neural NetworksFrench-language works237,207