Sweltsa hoffmani Kondratieff & Kirchner 2009
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sweltsa hoffmani Kondratieff & Kirchner Grubbs & Sheldon (2008) provided the first confirmed Alabama state record of Sweltsa onkos (Ricker) from Talladega National Forest. Kondratieff & Kirchner (2009) has since partitioned this species into a northern and eastern form (S. onkos) known from Atlantic Canada south to Virginia and recentlydescribed second species (S. hoffmani) distributed from western New York south to eastern Tennessee. This specimen has since been reexamined and determined as S. hoffmani. The prior Alabama records (James 1972, Stark & Harris 1986, Surdick 2004) for Sweltsa (as S. mediana (Banks)) were based on females, yet are likely S. hoffmani. Females of S. hoffmani, S. mediana, and S. onkos are very difficult to distinguish and the distribution of S. mediana is in the southern Appalachian Mountains only from southwestern Virginia south to northwestern South Carolina. In addition, a second state record of S. hoffmani is now confirmed from the far northwestern portion of the state. Material examined. U.S.A., Alabama, Cleburne Co., small stream draining Dugger Mountain, Talladega National Forest, 22 May 2006, A.L. Sheldon, 1♂ (WKU); Colbert Co., tributary to Ross Branch, CR 1, 6 km SE Waterloo, 4 May 2008, S.A. Grubbs, 1♂ (WKU).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".