Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genus Hoplostethus Cuvier, 1829 Description A large, adult otolith (Fig. 10F) of Hoplostethus lawleyi Koken, 1891 is easily distinguished from the Miocene Hoplostethus praemediterraneus Schubert, 1905 (Fig. 10 A–E) by its very depressed anterodorsal area. This feature also characterises large-sized otoliths of the extant Hoplostethus mediterraneus Cuvier, 1829, but otoliths of H. lawleyi are different from those of H. mediterraneus in having a wider sulcus, a strongly developed ostial colliculum and a narrower ventral area. The distinction between H. mediterraneus and H. praemediterraneus can be made with the help of the growth series of H. praemediterraneus from the Badenian of the Carpathian Foredeep (Brzobohatý 1978: pl. 1, figs 1–16, as Hoplostethus levis biexcissus and H. l. levis) and of our material (Fig. 10 A–E), which clearly demonstrate that the otoliths of H. praemediterraneus are, at each stage, higher and more compact in shape than those of H. mediterraneus (see Nolf 2013: pl. 165).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".