MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6912575923 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5460529

Williamsicoccus megalops Vea & Grimaldi 2015, new species

2015· article· en· W6912575923 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeSimple eye in invertebratesSetaDorsumPedicelThorax (insect anatomy)Genus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Williamsicoccus megalops, new species Figures 18A–B, 19 TYPE LOCALITY: Lebanon: Central Lebanon: Mdeyrij / Hammana: Caza Baabda: Mouhafazet Jabal Loubnon. Lower Cretaceous. TYPE: Holotype 1582, alate male in a 4 × 4 × 0.5 mm yellow, transparent, polished amber piece, embedded in Canada balsam and mounted in epoxy with two coverslips, with a few particles of debris; specimen is well preserved, although the wings are hardly visible and antennae truncated. accessible views: ventral and dorsal; Dany Azar amber collection, provisionally deposited in the Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle. ETYMOLOGY: The epithet megalops comes from Greek megalos, meaning “large or great” and ops, “eye,” referring to the large ventral eyes in this species and is a noun in apposition. DIAGNOSIS: As for genus. DESCRIPTION: Body minute, total length 775 μm, widest at mesothorax, ca. 235 μm. Head (fig. 19AB): Round, ca. 210 μm wide, ca. 170 μm long. Each ocular sclerite with two pairs of simple eyes (a pair dorsally and a pair ventrally), each dorsal eye ca. 25 μm, ventral eye larger than dorsal eye (ca. 40 μm) and positioned closer together; with a pair of lateral ocelli (10 μm wide). Antenna (fig. 19A): At least 6-segmented, but both antennae broken on holotype; lengths of segments (in μm): scape 25; pedicel 40; flagellar segments III to VI all filiform, subequal in length (ca 100 μm). Setae longer than segment width (ca. 35–60 μm). Thorax: Head and thorax slightly separated. Prothorax membranous, ridges not observable. Prosternal structure not visible. Mesothorax dorsally: prescutum oval, bulging (85 μm wide, 72 μm long); scutum without a membranous area; scutellum oval, almost as wide as prescutum (fig. 19C). Setae not detected. Ventrally: basisternum well developed with a median ridge. Wings (fig. 19D): Forewings elongate and thin, base narrow and round distally, ca. 885 μm long, 290 μm wide; subcostal ridge extending from the base of the wing to a little less than 3/4 wing length. Cubital ridge present, starting at wing base; alar setae and sensoria absent, microtrichia present. Alar lobe present. Hamulohalteres narrow, ca. 70 μm long; each with one hamulus (fig. 19E). Legs (fig. 19F): Long and slender, all subequal in length and shape, cuticular reticulations absent; measurements of foreleg: coxa 50 μm long; trochanter and femur, 150–160 μm long, 25–30 μm wide, with few short, hairlike setae; tibia: 130–160 μm long, 20 μm wide, with short hairlike setae, becoming numerous and spinose distally; tarsus 2-segmented, 45–50 μm long, 15 μm wide, tarsal digitules finely clavate; claw thin 10 μm, almost straight, digitules and denticles not observed. Abdomen: Ca. 345 μm long (315 μm without genital segment), 215 μm widest. Tergites and sternites well developed and segmentation easy to delineate. Abdominal setae not visible except for pleural setae on posteriormost segments. Tergite VII and VIII each side having wax filaments protruding out posteriad, indicating glandular pouches. Genital segment: Penial sheath short subtubular (40 μm long, 50 μm at base). Aedeagus not visible. Eversible endophallus absent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology→French-language works237,207→