Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cotesia glomerata (L., 1758) Distribution in Iran. Fars (Lashkari Bod et al. 2011), Guilan (Ghahari et al. 2010c), West Azarbaijan (Alizadeh and Moghaddam 2004; Khanjani 2006; Razmi et al. 2011). Distribution outside Iran. Austria, Malta, Norway, Palestina (Shenefelt 1972), Australia, Azerbaijan, Azores, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Egypt, Estonia, Fiji, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, India, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Moldova, Morocco, Netherlands, New Zealand, Pakistan, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Syria, Turkey, USA, Ukraine, UK, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Vietnam, former Yugoslavia (Yu et al. 2012). Host records. Antheraeopsis assama (Yu et al. 2012). In Vietnam it has been reported from Pieris rapae and P. canidia (Long and Belokobylskij 2003), Celerio euphorbiae, Notodonta dromaderius, Limantria monacha, Macroglossa stellatarum, Hemaris fuciformis (Shenefelt 1972). In Europe, it has been reported from Aporia crataegi L., Pieris brassicae, P. daplidice, P. rapae (Fahringer 1936). In Japan it has been reported from P. rapae and P. crataegi (Watanabe 1937). Also, Nixon (1974) reported this species as an abundant gregarious parasitoid of Pieris brassicae, Aporia crataegi and Pontia daplidice. In Iran, has been reported as parasitoid of Agrotis segetum (Alizadeh and Moghaddam 2004; Khanjani 2004, 2006), and Sesamia nonagrioides botanephaga (Khanjani 2004), it was also reported as the parasitoid of Saturniidae (Ghahari et al. 2010c), and larval parasitoid of Pieris brassicae (Razmi et al. 2011).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".