Lesteva brevipennis Cameron 1941
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lesteva (s.str.) brevipennis Cameron, 1941 Lesteva brevipennis Cameron, 1941: 143 Lesteva brevipennis: Lohse, 1982: 201, 203 Lesteva (s.str.) brevipennis: Shavrin, 2015a: 529 Lesteva pakistana Coiffait, 1984: 141 syn. n. Type material examined: Type of Lesteva brevipennis Cameron, 1941, ♀: INDIA: ‘ Type’ , ‘ Kashmir | Gulmarg | vi-vii-31 | Dr.Cameron’ , ‘ L. | brevipennis | TYPE [red, underlined] Cam [eron]’ , ‘ M.Cameron | Bequest. | B.M.1955- 147.’ , ‘ Lesteva | brevipennis Cam. | Shavrin A.V. det. 2016’ (BMNH). Paratypes of Lesteva brevipennis Cameron, 6 ♂, 2 ♀: same labels as the type except the type label: “Para- | type” (BMNH). Holotype of Lesteva pakistana Coiffait, 1984, ♂ [The specimen was reglued on a new card, with the apical abdominal segment under the beetle; the old card was mounted under the new card; a plastic card with a preparation of an aedeagus and abdominal sternite VIII in Canadian balsam has been pinned under the old card]: PAKISTAN: ‘ Pakistan, 1977 | Wittmer, Brancucci’ , ‘ Murree-Abbotta [printed] 13.VI [handwritten] | bad 2200-2500 m’ , ‘TYPE’ , ‘ Lesteva [handwritten] | pakistana [handwritten] | H. COIFFAIT det. 19[printed]83 [handwritten]’ , ‘ Lesteva (s.str.) | brevipennis Cameron, 1941 | Shavrin A.V. det. 2015’ (NHMB). Remarks. Lesteva brevipennis was described from Kashmir by Cameron (1941) and redescribed by Shavrin (2015a). Lohse (1982) studied the type material, which has also been restudied by me in BMNH (see above). Lesteva pakistana was described by Coiffait (1984) based on two males from ‘ Pakistan, Murree-Abbottabad [...]’ and was compared with L. kargilensis (cited as ‘ M. kongilensis Cam. [sic!]’). Coiffait provided sketchy figures of the aedeagus in two projections (Coiffait 1984: Figs. 33–34) based on the study of the dried preparation. During the study of the holotype I made a preparation of the aedeagus which proved to be identical (with a little smoother latero-apical porions of the median lobe) to aedeagi of specimens from Pakistan and Kashmir of L. (s.str.) brevipennis. Based on the proportions of the body, characters of punctation, microsculpture and coloration, L. pakistana is conspecific with L. (s.str.) brevipennis, which is the reason for the new synonym proposed here. The species is distributed in North India (Kashmir) and Pakistan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".