Bibliographic record
Abstract
Key to described species of Scapheremaeus known from eastern USA and Canada 1. All leg pretarsi tridactylous, with strong empodial claw and thin lateral claws. Rostrum broadly and evenly rounded; costulae and connecting ridges form small trapezoid, narrowest anteriorly. Microsculpture of central region of notogaster mostly of large, irregular transverse ridges. 460–540 μm ................................ S. marginalis (Banks), Fig. 6 B. - All leg pretarsi monodactylous. Rostrum tapered anteriorly, parabolic in outline; costulae strongly or weakly defined, connecting ridges present or absent, but central area not in form of small trapezoid. Microsculpture of central notogaster usually alveolate-reticulate; if with irregular ridges, patterns appear more longitudinal than transverse ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Circumdorsal scissure with inverted U-shape, centrodorsal region of notogaster not separated from lateral regions posteriorly. Notogastral microsculpture uniformly and densely areolate, with thick separating ridges almost as wide as small areoles. Bothridial seta with flattened, fan-shaped head, brown in transmitted light, longitudinal ridges clearly visible. 410–450 μm ............................................................................................... S. rodickae n. sp., Fig. 6 A. - Circumdorsal scissure elliptical, completely isolating centrodorsal region of notogaster as separate plate. Notogastral microsculpture with larger or more poorly defined areoles. Bothridial seta clavate to subcapitate, with thicker, more massive head; head black, longitudinal ridges (if present) inconspicuous in transmitted light .......................... 3 3. Posterior margin of notogaster evenly convex in dorsoventral aspect. Distal setae of leg tarsi with tips conspicuously expanded to twice width of seta immediately proximal to tip (“tenet hairs”). 300 μm (single known specimen) ........ ................................................................................................................................................... S. pulchellus (Berlese) - Posterior margin of notogaster medially concave in dorsoventral aspect. Distal setae of leg tarsi finely attenuate (S. parvulus) or very slightly expanded at tip (S. palustris) ............................................................................................. 4 4. Prodorsum without transverse ridge connecting costulae anteriorly; with narrow, sharply defined proximal ridges forming flattened “X”. Bothridial setae clavate, with head much longer than wide. Notogaster with pair of longitudinal ridges bearing setae lm and lp, and short extension of circumdorsal scissure toward humeral region on each side; alveolae of microsculpture all completely circumscribed by pattern of relatively reticulate ridges; each notogastral setae emerging through center of large alveola. 355–425 μm ....................................... S. parvulus (Banks), Fig. 6 D. - Prodorsum with costulae connected anteriorly by transverse ridge; with single irregular transverse proximal ridge (if with “X” then anterior arms very short). Bothridial seta subcapitate; head little longer than wide. Notogaster without longitudinal ridges or extensions of circumdorsal scissure; alveolae often irregular, incompletely formed or merged due to absence of separating reticulation; notogastral setae not emerging through conspicuous alveolae. 440–480 μm ...................................................................................................................................... S. palustris (Sellnick), Fig. 6 C.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.035 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".