Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stilbus apicalis (Melsheimer, 1844) NEW BRUNSWICK: York Co.: New Maryland, 45.83ºN 66.73ºW, 26.VI.2003, R.P. Webster, mixed forest, at light, (1, RWC). NOVA SCOTIA: Annapolis Co.: 19.VI.1995, J. Ogden, (1, NSNR); Colchester Co.: Bible Hill, 5.VIII.2004, 14.V.2005, 23.V.2005, 31.V.2005, K. Aikens, pasture, sweep net, (12, CBU). PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND: Queens Co.: Harrington, 2.IX.2005, 8.IX.2005, M.E.M. Smith, barley fields, sweep net, (10, ACPE). Stilbus apicalis is newly recorded in Atlantic Canada (Fig. 3). The species has previously been recorded in eastern North America from Ontario and Maine, south to Florida, and west to Louisiana, Kansas, and Illinois; and in the west from British Columbia south through Idaho to California (Leng 1920; Campbell 1991; Downie and Arnett 1996; Chandler 2001; Gimmel 2008). Little is known about its bionomics except that individuals have been collected by sweeping grasses (Steiner 1984), a habitat and collection mode consistent with most of the specimens collected in Atlantic Canada. Specimens are also commonly collected at lights (White 1983). Dearborn and Donahue (1993) reported individuals from spruce (Picea sp.) in Chesuncook and Augusta, Maine. Steiner (1984) noted that populations are almost exclusively comprised of females, and considered that it is likely a surface feeding, mold grazing, facultatively parthenogenic species. Th e precise hosts of S. apicalis are unknown although some adults were found on an unidentified smut growing on panic grass, P. dichotomiflorum (Steiner 1984).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.034 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".