Heterolepidoderma majus Remane 1927
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Heterolepidoderma aff. majus Remane, 1927 Fig. 35 Heterolepidoderma majus Remane, 1927: 313 –315, fig. 10. Locus typicus Germany. Material examined POLAND • 8adults; Kraków, Botanical Garden, Jubilee Greenhouse, sites 1–2; 50°03'38" N, 19°57'30"E; 15 Nov. 2013; M. Kolicka leg.; NHC (photomicrographs, also in the author's collection). Distribution Nominal Heterolepidoderma majus Remane, 1927 is a species that is widely distributed in Europe, inter alia reported from: Bulgaria (Valkanov 1937), France (Kisielewski 1997a), Germany (Remane 1927), Great Britain (Martin 1990), Poland (e.g., Roszczak 1936; Kisielewska & Kisielewski 1986a, 1986b, 1986 c), Russia (Tretjakova 1989) and Romania (Rudescu 1967); it has also been reported from Argentina (Grosso & Drahg 1984), Brazil (Kisielewski 1991), Canada (Schwank 1990) and Japan (Sudzuki 1971). Remarks The body length of adult specimens of Heterolepidoderma aff. majus Remane, 1927 varied from 111.1 to 131.4 μm; length of pharynx was between 31.9 and 40.3 μm; intestine length from 60.7 to 72.6 μm; 53–57 total longitudinal rows of scales (19–21D +10DL+8L+8–10LV+ 8V), with 23–27 scales in the central row (Fig. 35). In a previous paper, these specimens were reported as Heterolepidoderma majus Remane, 1927 (Kisielewska et al. 2015). However, although the specimens seemed to fall within the range of variability as reported by Schwank (1990) and Kisielewski (1997 a), the presence of one pair of scales with four keels, nearly parallel to one another, did not allow, after a thorough analysis, the identification of the specimens from the Jubilee Greenhouse as representatives of the nominal species H. majus. The question of the species affinities of these individuals demands further analyses and studies of intra- and interspecific variability within Heterolepidoderma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".