Lithobius melanops Newport 1845
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lithobius melanops Newport, 1845 Koren (1992): 75, figs 22a–c. Material examined (NMNHS): 1 ad. ♀, Sofia, Poduene, N 42.422661, E 23.220843, bathroom of an apartment, 16.VI.2003, leg. R. Spasova, det. PS.; 1 specimen, Sofia, National Academy of Art, N 42.696305, E 23.327054, 20.VI.2003, leg. R. Spasova, det. PS.; 1 ♂, Sofia N 42.415175, E 23.191872, in a block, near to a potted plant, 19.IV.2003, leg. I. Borisov, det. PS.; 1 ♂, same place, 18.X.2003, leg. I. Borisov, det. PS. Remarks. This species is new to the Bulgarian fauna, although it was previously recorded in the city greens of Shumen, identified as Lithobius aff. melanops (Bachvarova et al. 2015). However, this is the first definite record of the species in the country. Lithobius melanops is widely distributed in Europe including Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Britain I., Canary Is., Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark (mainland and Faroe Is.), Central and North European Russia, Finland, France (excl. Corsica), Germany, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Madeira Is., Norway, Poland, Romania, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain (mainland, excl. Balearic Is.), Sweden, Switzerland, The Netherlands, Ukraine; introduced to Newfoundland (Enghoff 2013). The subspecies borgei Eason and Ashmole, 1992 is known only from the Azores (Eason & Ashmole 1992); the N. African (Morocco) subspecies (protectus Brölemann, 1924; dayae Manfredi, 1956; tridentatus Demange, 1957) have been revised by Zapparoli (1984a, 1984b) who believes that they must be referred to species different from L. melanops (Zapparoli 2006). In Bulgaria, the species has been found only in highly urbanized environments—houses (in potted house and garden plants) and city parks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".