Pocadicnemis pumila Blackwall 1841
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pocadicnemis pumila (Blackwall 1841) (Fig. 29) Material examined.— Canada: Québec: RouynNoranda: Labyrinthe Lake [48°14’N, 79°29’W] 16.–23.vi.1996, Canopy funnel White cedar/Balsam fir forest, 3ɗ, P. Paquin & N. Dupérré (CPAD); RouynNoranda: Labyrinthe Lake [48°14’N, 79°29’W] 16.– 23.vi.1996, Malaise/flight interception trap (pan) in White cedar/Balsam fir forest, 1ɗ, P. Paquin & N. Dupérré (CPAD); AbitibiOuest: Duparquet Lake [48°30’N, 79°13’W] 16.– 23.vi.1996, Malaise/flight interception trap (pan) in White cedar/Balsam fir forest, 1ɗ, P. Paquin & N. Dupérré (CPAD); MontAlbert, La HauteGaspésie, Parc de la Gaspésie, Lac Pelletier [48°55’N, 66°02’W] 10.–23.vi.1994, pitfall in Picea mariana bog, 1ɗ, F. Landry (CPAD); BaieJames (Jamésie): 122 km NNE LaSarre [49°48’N, 78°54’W] 15.– 22.vi.1997, flight interception trap in mature Black spruce forest, 1ɗ, P. Paquin & N. Dupérré (CPAD); BaieJames (Jamésie): 122 km NNE LaSarre [49°48’N, 78°51’W] 06.– 15.vi.1997, flight interception trap in old growth Black spruce forest, 1ɗ, P. Paquin & N. Dupérré (CPAD); BaieJames (Jamésie): 122 km NNE LaSarre [49°48’N, 78°51’W] 15.– 22.vi.1997, flight interception trap in old growth Black spruce forest, 1ɗ, P. Paquin & N. Dupérré (CPAD); BaieJames (Jamésie): 122 km NNE LaSarre [49°48’N, 78°51’W] 22.– 29.vi.1997, flight interception trap in old growth Black spruce forest, 1ɗ, P. Paquin & N. Dupérré (CPAD). Diagnosis.— Pocadicnemis pumila is distinguished from P. a m e r i c a n a by the straight median apophysis (MA) of the male palpus (Fig. 29). Distribution.— Widespread in North America. Remark.— Pocadicnemis pumila is very similar to P. americana (see Paquin & Dupérré 2003, figs 1206–1208), and these two species are commonly found in the same habitat. Millidge (1976), who described P. americana, gave characters to distinguish males and females of the two species, but examination of several specimens and comparison with his illustrations led us to the conclusion that females are impossible to separate. Therefore, the present records are from males only. We rely on the shape of the median apophysis to distinguish the two species (straight in P. pumila and curved in P. americana see Fig. 30, and Millidge 1976: figs 24 and 40) but we are not convinced that these represent disctinct species. A few specimens examined (omitted here) could have been placed in P. pumila based on examination of the right palp and in P. americana with the left palp. However, the two species are actually valid and we report the present records on that premise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".