Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cybaeus thermydrinos Bennett Figs 29–31, 33, 38–40, 42 Cybaeus thermydrinos Bennett in Copley et al. 2009: 385, figs 61–66. World Spider Catalog 2020. Type material. Holotype male. U.S.A.: California: Tulare County, 2.5 miles east of California Hot Springs, matured 5 October 1959, W.J. Gertsch & V. D. Roth (CAS), examined. Other material examined. Specimens and locality data in Copley et al. (2009). Diagnosis. Cybaeus thermydrinos is grouped with C. fraxineus spec. nov. in the informal fraxineus subgroup. Distinguishing the aspenicolens and fraxineus subgroups is discussed in the aspenicolens species group diagnosis. Differentiating the male and female of C. thermydrinos from those of C. fraxineus spec. nov. is discussed in the diagnosis of the latter. Description. See Copley et al. (2009). Distribution. Southern Tulare County and adjacent northern Kern County, California on the western slopes of the southern Sierra Nevada (Fig. 42).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".