Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cybaeus thermydrinos Bennett Figs 29–31, 33, 38–40, 42 Cybaeus thermydrinos Bennett in Copley et al. 2009: 385, figs 61–66. World Spider Catalog 2020. Type material. Holotype male. U.S.A.: California: Tulare County, 2.5 miles east of California Hot Springs, matured 5 October 1959, W.J. Gertsch & V. D. Roth (CAS), examined. Other material examined. Specimens and locality data in Copley et al. (2009). Diagnosis. Cybaeus thermydrinos is grouped with C. fraxineus spec. nov. in the informal fraxineus subgroup. Distinguishing the aspenicolens and fraxineus subgroups is discussed in the aspenicolens species group diagnosis. Differentiating the male and female of C. thermydrinos from those of C. fraxineus spec. nov. is discussed in the diagnosis of the latter. Description. See Copley et al. (2009). Distribution. Southern Tulare County and adjacent northern Kern County, California on the western slopes of the southern Sierra Nevada (Fig. 42).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.064 | 0.032 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".