MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6912674366 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5997704

Calycomyza menthae Spencer

2018· article· en· W6912674366 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrunella vulgarisMoringaSweet BasilSAGEHerb

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Calycomyza menthae Spencer (Fig. 114) Material examined. MASSACHUSETTS: Hampshire Co., Pelham, 88 Arnold Rd., 30.v.2014, em. 17– 30.vi.2014, C.S. Eiseman, ex Monarda didyma, #CSE1128, CNC384863–384876 (7♂ 7♀); NORTH CAROLINA: Durham Co., Durham, Pelham Rd., 21.v.2016, em. 3.vi.2016, T.S. Feldman, ex Hedeoma hispida, #CSE2539, CNC634978 (1♂); OKLAHOMA: Payne Co., Mehan, 36.014339° N, -96.996744° W, 20.iv.2017, em. 7.v.2017, M.W. Palmer, ex Monarda fistulosa, #CSE3736, CNC939889 (1♂); VERMONT: Chittenden Co., Williston, Mud Pond, 28.viii.2016, em. iv.2017, C.S. Eiseman, ex Lycopus uniflorus, #CSE3566, CNC940122 (1♂). Tentatively identified material. MASSACHUSETTS: Hampden Co., Westfield, 12.viii.2014, em. 24.viii– 2.ix.2014, C.S. Eiseman, ex Lycopus uniflorus, #CSE1356, CNC384833, CNC384834 (2♀); Middlesex Co., Townsend, 42.68888526, -71.75159779, 19.vii.2017, em. 4.viii.2017, C.S. Eiseman, ex Lycopus uniflorus, #CSE4068, CNC939732 (1♀); OREGON: Lane Co., Blue River, 20.vii.2017, em. 8.viii.2017, M.W. Palmer, ex Prunella vulgaris, #CSE4262, CNC939939 (1♀). Hosts. Lamiaceae: * Hedeoma hispida Pursh, * Lycopus uniflorus Michx., Mentha arvensis L., Monarda * didyma L., M. fistulosa L. (Spencer 1969). Spencer & Steyskal (1986) recorded the following additional hosts based on leaf mines from California and Florida where adults have not been found: Hyptis mutabilis (A. Rich.) Briq., Monarda punctata L., Monardella odoratissima Benth., and Ocimum L. Spencer (1969) tentatively attributed a leaf mine on Agastache nepetoides (L.) Kuntze to this species. Our female reared from Prunella vulgaris L. is consistent with Calycomyza menthae, as are the leaf mines on this host, but males would be needed to be certain of the identification. This is the first record of any Calycomyza from Prunella. We have found likely mines of C. menthae on Mentha canadensis L. and M. spicata L. in Massachusetts. A leaf mine on Pycnanthemum Michx. photographed in Maryland (Wilson 2013) may also represent C. menthae; this is not a known host for any agromyzid. Leaf mine. (Fig. 114) Initially a narrow brown line, expanding to a messy, brownish blotch with clean, whitish margins here and there. Feeding lines like those of Nemorimyza posticata were visible in some examples. In the small leaves of Hedeoma, the mine occupies the entire leaf surface. Puparium. Yellowish-brown to pale reddish-brown; formed outside the mine. Distribution. USA: *MA, *NC, *OK, *VT; Canada: AB (Sehgal 1971), ON. The records of California and Florida (Spencer & Steyskal 1986) are based only on leaf mines. Our tentatively identified female reared from Prunella was collected in Oregon, and we have seen probable Calycomyza menthae mines on Monarda (including photographs posted to www.BugGuide.net) in CT, IA, MN, MO, and WI. Comments. The only other Lamiaceae-feeding Calycomyza recorded from North America is C. hyptidis Spencer, which forms a characteristic star-shaped blotch with the frass all deposited in the center. It is not known to occur north of Florida. Although the host and distribution records based on leaf mines noted above may well all represent C. menthae, male specimens are needed to confirm them.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior→French-language works237,207→